Thanos vs Supermans

Started by LordofBrooklyn43 pages

Originally posted by Insane Titan
That's all your worth.

Like I do every time yet you still continue to say you won lol, like this so called Sentry thread you banged on about. Yet when someone actually found the thread you ran from it AGAIN.

You're a pathetic liar!

First, you claimed the thread never existed. Then, when someone actually posted the thread you attempted to laugh off not only your being crushed but the fact that you PM'd me about the beating,

Now to top it all off you claim you won and I RAN AGAIN!

😂 😂

You're a sick joke.

If you feel so confident about your performance post the link to the thread here.

You won't do it.

Guys, cut it out. Seriously. Stop derailing threads.

Originally posted by carver9
😠 😠

I'm so mad. Let me have it.

For all who want to see the slow mo ft. Hercules gains Spiderman powers and states that he is able to see (and react of course) the world in time slow motion view. The world is at a halt and he had enough time to think while looking at the bullets at at stand still and react by cutting the bullets out of the air.

http://s715.photobucket.com/user/ankur2113/media-full//Herc_7_TheGroup_016.jpg.html


Captain America can do so too Carter. It's not that big deal.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Captain America can do so too Carter. It's not that big deal.

So you have scans of Cap seeing the world in slow mo? Also, who is Carter?

Originally posted by carver9
So you have scans of Cap seeing the world in slow mo? Also, who is Carter?

Yes, he can see bullets in slow mo. You're carter of course.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yes, he can see bullets in slow mo. You're carver of course.

Scans of him seeing the world at slow mo.

I think you are spelling your words wrong. I corrected that for you.

Originally posted by carver9
Scans of him seeing the world at slow mo.

I think you are spelling your words wrong. I corrected that for you.

😂

Originally posted by carver9
Scans of him seeing the world at slow mo.

I think you are spelling your words wrong. I corrected that for you.


Not world, just the bullets. Just like spidey.

No, you are carter. Accept it and I'll bestow the scan on you.

Exploding scan.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You're very versed on superman. Even though I think you put on blinders when it comes to him, and misrepresent scans on his behalf.. I will admit that you know your superman more than most on here. I won't argue that point. Which is why I'm confused on why you need to do more research... You know very well that Superman has been tossed around more times than Thanos has... you don't need to investigate that to know it's true Abhi

But when has it been by Grundy? Issue numbers please.

Or you're simply lying? What is it, this time?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Nix Uotan summoning them does not suddenly negate your supposed "multiversal" black hole+++ pressures that they should be enduring.
Of course it does, Monitors can negate universal attacks as shown in countdown.

Your claim of straight up denying a feat is only valid if it was actually one. A non-feat doesn't need to be denied.

Hahahahaha. This is just hilarious.

Lol.. No one is saying Darkseid's black hole did not pull down the parallel universes. You and your logical fallacies. Like I said. You are attributing the characteristics of a regular black hole to the one in Final Crisis. Actually it's you who are ignoring on panel scans.
And why not? As shown it was affecting green lanterns. So what proof do you need to see more?

Lets look at the facts.

Earth Zero seemed to be in tact as it was being pulled by the black hole from around issue #5 when the GL Corp first mentioned it. It wasn't until around issue 7 that Earth Zero may have sustained damage. In fact multiple earth's weren't obliterated as they were spiraling down this black hole.

Flat out lie. Two universes were destroyed. It was also later informed in JLA that Darkseid's fall destroyed Milestone universe.

http://i42.tinypic.com/o08961.jpg
http://i42.tinypic.com/i20bi9.jpg

http://imgur.com/6CrjFbK

So yeah, flat out lie from you. As usual.

The Watchtower survived for quite a while even when being pulled by Darkseid's black hole. A normal black hole would have ripped that thing apart long before it even fell into the abyss.
A normal black hole doesn't destroys several universes.

In the very end we see the GL corps who may have used the monitor ships to reach the abyss "no selling" this "multiversal" black hole. The Supermen of the multiverse seem as if there is no overwhelming "multiversal" gravity acting upon them. We see the Pax Dei angels, the Super Young Team, and the Zoo Crew having no ill effects from this "multiversal" +++ black hole. We even see Ultraman and a barely conscious Kara "no sell" omgwtfzorz "multiversal" +++ black hole.
Other than GL corps and Supermen, everyone was summoned by Nix and protected by him. But I like how "universe destroying, multiverse pulling black hole" had no effect on them whatsoever.

Hence, its not a black hole. Despite its affects on panel.

You've reached new levels of desperation here.

Lastly there's not even a single mention of unbearable "multiversal" black hole +++ pressures these guys would have to endure.
Unlike two universes which got ripped apart?

I swear this is one of the most horrendous interpretations of a comic I've ever seen. Words can't describe it.

😆

I have never seen such denial with ignoring so many proofs and on panel scans.

Sad.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is like you don't understand your own argument because it keeps changing. Now you are saying Thanos was afraid despite him cackling and not taking them seriously enough by depowering himself.

He killed them despite not taking then seriously. He did this to impress death. Warlock knew they stood no chance and the real chance was to distract him enough for Surfer to take his gems. It failed. He slapped and defeated Cap easily.

Retread the comic because you didn't get the point. My point is Thanos doesn't fight in this mindset normally so you trying to cite this as a legit example is preposterous.

Stick to the topic. I responded in the off topic thread. 🙂

No, I am just pointing out your own logic.

He wasn't affraid, he was campy and yet he found the need to kill them, even so they only have .05% chance of winning.

And I just remember for someone who cut himself of the reality gem he quite accomplished a few things that He should not have been able to do, like shrinking Hulk, turning Thor into crystal, Turning nova into cubes, creating quartz cubes on cyclops head, unphasing vision and turning adamatium bones into sponges.

Yes quite the sensory input handicap for someone so confident on himself 🙄

So Thanos does not fight with the mindset of winning? 😂

Originally posted by carver9
He can SEE bullets moving in slow mo and when it happened, it was referenced as a speed ft.

That migh be ignorance on the writter. Spiderman dodges bullets and punches because of his spider senses which are a precog hability.

He has however superhuman reflexes aided by his precog habilities, IIRC.

Care to show scan and refference?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
1. If you know this, then why ask for a Thanos' feat comparable to him bench pressing the earth?

2. "Going all out" is subjective and not factual. If superman says I'm going to put this person down... that pretty much means he's going all out. Why would somebody think somebody is a threat... threatening people you love lives... and you go.. they are done. Why would they not try? That makes ZERO logical sense. Your version of him going all out isn't canon to DC. They don't care about your opinion on what going all out means. That doesn't need to be stated in order for him to be going all out. Now, again, who's gotten Feeb'd more.. Superman or Thanos?

You still don't get it.

1. Thanos strength- It is YOU Thanosi that are making the contention that Thanos is stronger than Superman. There is nothing in Thanos canon that indicates that. Since you insist to make the claim you should have feats to back it up. Reducing it solely to " Lifting" is an excuse.

2. Going all out- This non-point of yours is laughable!

DC has created entire storylines to demonstrate the distinction between a restrained Superman and one that is going all out.

What do you think OWAW was meant to demonstrate in regards to Superman?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
No, I am just pointing out your own logic.

He wasn't affraid, he was campy and yet he found the need to kill them, even so they only have .05% chance of winning.

And I just remember for someone who cut himself of the reality gem he quite accomplished a few things that He should not have been able to do, like shrinking Hulk, turning Thor into crystal, Turning nova into cubes, creating quartz cubes on cyclops head, unphasing vision and turning adamatium bones into sponges.

Yes quite the sensory input handicap for someone so confident on himself 🙄

So Thanos does not fight with the mindset of winning? 😂

He put on a show that's why. He gave them a chance to win and took them on recklessly.

He was just unable to see his opponents next move. This was all supported on panel.

He fought with the mindset of winning but he focuses more than he did in this showmanship feat. Your inability to understand your own posts and ineptitude in debating by trying to twist my words is indeed something.

Thanos still prevailed and still won despite Surfer who traveled at over from another posters calculations well over a billion times the speed of light while fighting someone else with his own senses.

🙂

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
You still don't get it.

1. Thanos strength- It is YOU Thanosi that are making the contention that Thanos is stronger than Superman. There is nothing in Thanos canon that indicates that. Since you insist to make the claim you should have feats to back it up. Reducing it solely to " Lifting" is an excuse.

2. Going all out- This non-point of yours is laughable!

[B]DC has created entire storylines to demonstrate the distinction between a restrained Superman and one that is going all out.

What do you think OWAW was meant to demonstrate in regards to Superman? [/B]

This is a clownshoes type of response LOB. Reread the thread at NO point did I make the INITIAL claim that Thanos was stronger. I was simply responding to you and others who MADE that claim. So get your sequence of events right. I came to the thread to crush said notion by illustrating the amount of times Superman has gotten Feeb'd

Wrong again, I'm not talking about writers you actively right him that way. For those writers, yes this can be seen. However, there are MANY writers, most even, who haven't written superman's powers being controlled by his conscious and unconscious mind. Some writers wrote the blocks he had. OWAW IS a great example of this. However, that is only one writer. What I'm saying is, if a writer doesn't write superman that way, then when he trying to save people he loves by going after the bad guy... He's trying to put them down. Period. He's giving it his all. Why would he half ass saving the world? he wouldn't. That makes zero logical sense.

Again, who's gotten Feeb'd more... Superman or Thanos?

Originally posted by abhilegend
But when has it been by Grundy? Issue numbers please.

Or you're simply lying? What is it, this time?

Even though I know that you know incidents with Grundy... I'll slightly appease you with this example

http://img25.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-10746/loc124/06507_Superman676001_122_124lo.jpg

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Even though I know that you know incidents with Grundy... I'll slightly appease you with this example

http://img25.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-10746/loc124/06507_Superman676001_122_124lo.jpg


I don't know any grundy Superman fights post crisis.

That's young Superman from year one.

And he killed Grundy in one hit when he actually hit him.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
This is a clownshoes type of response LOB. Reread the thread at NO point did I make the INITIAL claim that Thanos was stronger. I was simply responding to you and others who MADE that claim. So get your sequence of events right. I came to the thread to crush said notion by illustrating the amount of times Superman has gotten Feeb'd

Wrong again, I'm not talking about writers you actively right him that way. For those writers, yes this can be seen. However, there are MANY writers, most even, who haven't written superman's powers being controlled by his conscious and unconscious mind. Some writers wrote the blocks he had. OWAW IS a great example of this. However, that is only one writer. What I'm saying is, if a writer doesn't write superman that way, then when he trying to save people he loves by going after the bad guy... He's trying to put them down. Period. He's giving it his all. Why would he half ass saving the world? he wouldn't. That makes zero logical sense.

Again, who's gotten Feeb'd more... Superman or Thanos?

Jurgens, Carlin, Ordway, Loeb have all written Superman with a significant level of restraint.

As to why Superman would "Half-ass save the world" his abilities are so immense that if he started out at 100% the consequences would be severe. Clark is powerful enough that 40 or 50% capacity is enough to gauge most threats and work his way up.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I don't know any grundy Superman fights post crisis.

That's young Superman from year one.

And he killed Grundy in one hit when he actually hit him.

and? This doesn't change the fact that he was getting feeb'd left and right throughout the fight. This has been common place for superman throughout his history. This is in STARK contrasts to Thanos who rarely gets treated in such ways... True or no?

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Jurgens, Carlin, Ordway, Loeb have all written Superman with a significant level of restraint.

As to why Superman would "Half-ass save the world" his abilities are so immense that if he started out at 100% the consequences would be severe. Clark is powerful enough that 40 or 50% capacity is enough to gauge most threats and work his way up.

So? I mentioned some writers do write him that way. Never argued against that. However, you can't retroactively try to pass their canon onto people who didn't write him that way. Doesn't work that way. Many haven't written him that way... so when he's goes... I'm done playing around.. or that's it... or any number of things... He's trying. PERIOD. No amount of superman apologists can change that fact. DC nor I care about what you think a superman going all out is. Stop bringing your subjective view into the argument. I'll ask again, who's gotten feeb'd more... Thanos or Superman?