Originally posted by riv6672
Again, not looking to change your mind.
I made a statement on an MB (in my own thread to boot). That statement is no more a waste of time than anything written in all caps/red font.
I just find it rather contradictory how you spend more time defending you won't debate and won't have your mind changed than actually properly defending your stance.
Originally posted by carver9
He would've done it easily. This is the same guy that was on his feet after having a sun on his back.
I've seen the scans, and if you're going to justify Hulk supported the weight of a star, then you have to accept Superman's superior stellar level feats.
Otherwise, you're a hypocrite. Of course we know you're going to try to have your cake and eat it too.
Originally posted by Delta1938
I've seen the scans, and if you're going to justify Hulk supported the weight of a star, then you have to accept Superman's superior stellar level feats.Otherwise, you're a hypocrite. Of course we know you're going to try to have your cake and eat it too.
That is also hypocrisy. To use your own put down.
While i enjoy a little back and forth, i'm not going to "defend" anything for multiple pages to a closed minded hypocrite who ignores the obvious difference in Brick/Flying Brick.
Originally posted by SquallX
You're pathetic.
Come to me when Hulk and any other characters you wank can beat a being that gets stronger the more you think of him.
Also, unlike you're precious wank characters, Kal is not a brute that would destroy anything just to kill someone. He actually gives a damn about the ones he chooses to protect.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Just one? Batman had several suns in his glove and was swinging them easilyBatman in his suit>>>hulk.
Not just any suns. Red suns, so larger than the average.
But sure, Proxima Midnight can leap about whilst swinging this stellar spear, and Cage tanked her best blows.
Cage = abstract.
Originally posted by riv6672
The only difference between Hulk and Supes feats? Hulk is limited by the fact he cant fly.
Originally posted by Delta1938
I've seen the scans, and if you're going to justify Hulk supported the weight of a star, then you have to accept Superman's superior stellar level feats.Otherwise, you're a hypocrite. Of course we know you're going to try to have your cake and eat it too.
What stellar ft?
Originally posted by riv6672
Stellar level feats that require Superman to fly, more than likely.
THAT is the true circular argument, Delta.
A Hulk feat can be matched by a Superman feat, as both have "static lifts".
Many Superman feat cant be matched by Hulk, as Hulk cant perform them due to not possessing flight.
So, Superman fans can/do claim Superman to be superior, because of this.That is also hypocrisy. To use your own put down.
While i enjoy a little back and forth, i'm not going to "defend" anything for multiple pages to a closed minded hypocrite who ignores the obvious difference in Brick/Flying Brick.
A circular argument is an argument that only works if you assume it to be true. You argue the feats "more than likely" required flight, when A: specific examples haven't even been cited, and B: would have to prove it provided some enhancement if flight was a part.
Two of the examples I had in mind were not flight dependent as he held them at points while not flying at all. You're using "he flew!!" As a crutch, really.
You went into that pointless rant without even asking what examples I had in mind. You continue to defend your inability to debate instead of your arguments. And you call me a hypocrite without knowing what the **** you're talking about.
Are you just in love with reading your own typing?