Force storms vs. Ziost

You say "traveling through", but isn't a black hole fundamentally just a ball of super-dense mass? It's not the same as a wormhole, which to my knowledge is still an entirely hypothetical concept.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
You say "traveling through", but isn't a black hole fundamentally just a ball of super-dense mass? It's not the same as a wormhole, which to my knowledge is still an entirely hypothetical concept.

However, there is more to a blackhole then traditional notion of it utterly absorbing everything in its path as newer studies are suggesting. Scientist Stephen Hawking is also writing a paper on this topic. This is why a blackhole is still regarded as a conundrum.

This is good information: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/172130-wormholes-are-just-quantum-entangled-black-holes-says-new-research

The researchers stipulate that wormholes are actually entangled black holes. This entanglement might be caused by two black holes being created simultaneously, or perhaps radiation emitted by one black hole could be captured by another black hole, creating some kind of entanglement.

More here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3559191/Is-universe-littered-WORMHOLES-Supermassive-black-holes-laced-dark-matter-produce-tunnels-space.html

However, a cosmic wormhole-like phenomenon is predicted to be unstable and immensely dangerous: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/would-astronauts-survive-interstellar-trip-through-wormhole-180953269/

One research suggests that only protons can pass through a cosmic wormhole-like phenomenon safely: http://news.discovery.com/space/wormhole-time-travel-possible-if-youre-a-photon-140521.htm

---

Some perceive wormhole-like phenomenon as strictly theoretical at present but we must not forget that Einstien's General Theory of Relativity predicted existence of both blackholes and wormholes.

Wormholes might be real but they are not as friendly as we see in the movies.

Wormholes are not black holes. Not even close.

Yeesh, Legend, you can't apply scientific theories that haven't even been proven in the real world to hyperspace wormwholes or Force storms (both of which have teleported matter unharmed) as they manifest in a work of fiction.

Unless you have SW-related source that states Palpatine's Force storms have these properties its a moot point, because its not canon. 😬

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
This question should be directed towards Ellimist, not me. He brought superlasers into this discussion.

Thanks for conceding.

Actions speak louder then words. 👆

That looks like a moon, not a planet. 👆

And for the record those are the craters created by the bombardment and obviously they aren't going to slag an uninhabited planet.

One power removes the force in its entirety from the planet
One power may reduce the planet to ash.
Apples and Oranges would be a valid critique of this comparison.

Apples and Oranges comparison. 🙂

Yeah, they're not exactly comparable in a lot of ways.

Force Storms reduce planets to ash? That doesn't sound right.

Nope.

They swallow universes, duh.

Careful uhuh

Or what, oh retired one?

I think Newguy could take you handily, tbh.

Newguy would be a worthy opponent.

It would be a breath of fresh air from stomping you. stoned

We've barely talked in months.

Neph is saying he misses you, Temp.

My aim is getting better though.

😂

Originally posted by Nephthys
We've barely talked in months.

Yeah, I know. But I don't need many words to beat you. excellent

So I assume Force Storm is still the most destructive force power ever known?

Nope. Sadow's supernova is the best outside of Vitiates galaxy ritual.