Originally posted by The Ellimist
Dude, you still haven't figured out how to not be a hypocrite every time you open your browser. That exact same logic could also be applied to Vader, given that Vader had just been using the Force to fight and why would he not use the Force if he knows he's taking on the f*cking Emperor?
Because he doesn't show he used the force. It's the same horrific logic to assume everything Superman does ugh superspeed if the movie doesn't imply it. Why wouldn't he wait until he had his lightsaber ? Why didn't he let Luke strike him down ? We can tell in that moment he succumbed to the light and sacrificed himself to dispose of the emperor out of love for his son. If you can't prove something then it's a baseless claim.
I know it's tough for you to figure out but I was mocking your own logic and trying to get you to realize how horrible it was, but you just won't learn lmao. [/B]
Entirely different situations. In one instance we see a gut check reaction in which he overpowers an old man howling firing his fl in protest.
In the other instance we see Snoke not even try to kill her but keep her in check with the force both to extract information and to manipulate her body at will. Vader at no point uses the force to attack Palpatine. We see Palpatine use the force by hurling fl in a panic to defend himself in his current predicament. If you still want to object to her using the force she will defend herself when someone is trying to purge intel from her mind.
We've also seen most force users decide the superior combatant without force power and having to rely on the saber anyways.