Old Master Maul vs. Galen Marek (Lightsabers only)

Started by carthage6 pages

Old Master Maul vs. Galen Marek (Lightsabers only)

*TFU 1 Galen vs. Loser who gets his ass kicked by Padawans (twice)

Duel takes place on neutral ground

Galen.

Galen obviously

In my opinion, there are two ways we can go about this. If it comes to general skill, then I'd have to place Maul a bit ahead of Galen. He's just a bit better.

But I'd prefer to take a note form the bible of Maul fans - and one Maul fan in particular - who's convinced himself that feats, as they appear in fiction, are completely unimportant when debating who would win a fight. Rather that only thing to consider, is how things would play out from a story telling perspective. In which case Maul, being the dastardly antagonist he is, might find himself on the winning end of a battle, only to later slip on shit and impale himself.

Can I ask which of their accolades/feats makes you think Maul would be above Galen?

Galen is a shitty duelist. He's pretty much al self-taught and it shows but Maul got beaten by Kanan... Galen wins

He's taught by Vader actually to the point he had nearly perfected lightsaber combat. Given he matched Vader in their final duel unless you're saying Vader is a shitty duelist then your assessment doesn't make much sense.

He really isn't a near perfect duelist, God. He matched Vader through superior force power :/

I'm sorry but your opinion < less then a quote from an official source.

Maul.

Galen was keeping up with a "shadow of his former self" Vader. We even see that TFII Starkiller, the superior version of Galen, loses to Vader who was partially holding back, so yeah Maul takes it. Also it's kind of funny that people keep saying Maul lost to blind Kanan while completely disregarding feats, accolades and the writer's intent which all point to Kanan receiving a momuntarely amplification of power.

Who cares how much momentary power a padawan gets, he shouldn't beat a Sith Lord.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Who cares how much momentary power a padawan gets, he shouldn't beat a Sith Lord.

*Jedi Knight, anyway I don't ask you to care just to accept it and stop being ignorant because you don't like it.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Who cares how much momentary power a padawan gets, he shouldn't beat a Sith Lord.
Oneness is a massive power boost that should put him comfortably above Maul.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Can I ask which of their accolades/feats makes you think Maul would be above Galen?

All his fights against Kenobi.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Who cares how much momentary power a padawan gets, he shouldn't beat a Sith Lord.

👆

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Oneness is a massive power boost that should put him comfortably above Maul.

No it really shouldn't.

Unless of course they show Maul in "Oneness" taking down Vader or something, that whole scene was total BS and seriously disrespectful to the character. Disrespect they would never show to Vader, Palpatine. Heck probably not even to Thrawn!

Only Quanchi112 (and other Maul haters) would defend such blatant disrespect to Maul.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
All his fights against Kenobi.

👆

No it really shouldn't.

Unless of course they show Maul in "Oneness" taking down Vader or something, that whole scene was total BS and seriously disrespectful to the character. Disrespect they would never show to Vader, Palpatine. Heck probably not even to Thrawn!

Only Quanchi112 (and other Maul haters) would defend such blatant disrespect to Maul.

Nobody is saying you have to like it, I hate what they did to him, but that doesn't mean that you can ust ignore the evidence which actually is in Maul's favor.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Nobody is saying you have to like it, I hate what they did to him, but that doesn't mean that you can ust ignore the evidence which actually is in Maul's favor.

I mean I don't think anyone has actually argued Kanan =/> Maul.

Everyone knows Maul is >>> Kanan.

But what I'm asking is will "Oneness Maul" be doing anything special anytime soon? If not, then that's simply a terrible low moment for a character who already had 1 low moment too many.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I mean I don't think anyone has actually argued Kanan =/> Maul.

Everyone knows Maul is >>> Kanan.

But what I'm asking is will "Oneness Maul" be doing anything special anytime soon? If not, then that's simply a terrible low moment for a character who already had 1 low moment too many.

Well I doubt that Maul's going to experience a moment of Oneness anytime soon, I always felt that "the Force taking over" was just a plot device for the weaker protagonists to defeat their (stronger) enemies. I don't like the explanation they're giving to us, but at least it's acceptabel to a certain degree.

Maul.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Well I doubt that Maul's going to experience a moment of Oneness anytime soon, I always felt that "the Force taking over" was just a plot device for the weaker protagonists to defeat their (stronger) enemies. I don't like the explanation they're giving to us, but at least it's acceptabel to a certain degree.

Problem is if it doesn't work both ways, then it still makes Maul look bad.

Unless and until somebody quantifies the level of Kanan's amp, it's certainly a low point for Maul to lose to him. Low points guys like Dooku and Vader don't have unless we count Vader's Skywalker Father vs Son battles.

And Even then, Maul's is the much weaker showing, given everyone is unanimous in thinking Luke > Kanan.