Originally posted by quanchi112
He flat out says, "There is no conflict." Once again you ignore what words mean because you get really desperate. Actions matter not words. Kylo killed his father. Vader loved his son too much to do so. Period.During the fight he lied and said he wasn't. Once again it doesn't matter since Vader failed whereas Kylo prevailed.
Kylo said he'd be successful and he was. Snoke successfully seduced him Palpatine failed.
My position is correct. Your flip flop debating is all over the place. You change your position and distance yourself from the results of both. Kylo was successful Vader failed.
I am not denying that Vader said "there is no conflict". However, he suggested that he was unsure of himself when he stated solemnly "It is too late for me, son" (to go back to the light), and by saying that "he must obey his master" when Luke offers him to come with him. He is clearly conflicted and uncertain.
Vader's choice of words here is important. He says "You don't know the power of the Dark Side. I must obey my master!" Why is this important? Because it means that Vader doesn't obey Palpatine because he likes him, or because he wants to do it. He obeys because the Dark Side is too powerful to resist. He is trapped.
Again, when Luke says "Let go of your hate!", Vader doesn't say "No way! Hate is the best thing ever, and I love it!" He says, rather mournfully, "It is too late for me, son. The Emperor will show you the true nature of the Force. He is your master now." This gives me the impression that:
Vader regrets becoming a Sith. He doesn't like being Vader. He feels that his bad decisions in the past have doomed him to remain evil, and if he had the opportunity, he would go back and do things differently.
If Vader could leave the Emperor's service, he would do so, but he thinks he isn't strong enough to pull it off, or good enough to deserve a better life. He hates himself.
You want more sources that Vader was conflicted?
In the canon book Sith Lords, Vader saves a small girl from being killed by Sidious.
Going back to RotJ:
Luke: Then you know why I have to face him.
Leia: No! Luke, run away, far away! If he can feel your presence, then leave this place! I wish I could go with you.
Luke: No, you don't. You've always been strong.
Leia: But why must you confront him?
Luke: Because there is good in him. I've felt it. He won't turn me over to the Emperor. I can save him. I can turn him back to the good side. I have to try. [kisses Leia on the cheek, then leaves]
Let's see what George Lucas had to say about this:
"You learn that Darth Vader isn’t this monster. He’s a pathetic individual who made a pact with the Devil and lost. And he’s trapped. He’s a sad, pathetic character, not a big evil monster. I mean, he’s a monster in that he’s turned to the Dark Side and he’s serving a bad master and he’s into power and he’s lost a lot of his humanity. In that way, he’s a monster, but beneath that, as Luke says in Return of the Jedi, early on, “I know there’s still good in you, I can sense it.” Only through the love of his children and the compassion of his children, who believe in him, even though he’s a monster, does he redeem himself."
Okay are we done with Vader now? Yes, Vader is in a way a pathetic failure who is over-hyped by OT fanboys. But that wasn't the original issue when we first started this bickering.
I stated that Kylo was an immature character due to his multiple rampages which show how emotions get the better of him. You went off-topic with Vader. Now that we settled that, can you focus on Kylo please?