Beniboybling
Worst Member
Originally posted by SunRazer
Also, what retcons BoS in regards to Maul?
TCW. Maul is described by Sidious as an "animal" incapable of applying himself beyond a "limited" set of tasks. Yet in TCW he masterminds an operation that becomes a threat to Sidious' own designs, and in SoD outmanoeuvres both Grievous and Dooku.
That said I think that predates BoS, in which case its just inaccurate, or Palpatine is attempting to downplay a failed apprentice.
There's JvS, which states that he foresaw Maul's death and made no effort to warn him because he was expendable. But that's retconned.
Yeah, the perspective on Maul has changed over time.
Well, BoS suggests as much, but I'll find some more specific quotes.
Not sure how, when its written after Anakin's injuries.
He recognized that Luke could destroy him. He explicitly wants Luke to rule with him as his Hand, not succeed him, as of DE.As for Marek, he was really just lamenting what had been lost. I don't believe it means he actually wanted Marek to be his successor (that was by the time that he planned on being omnipotent), just that he wielded enough power to be able to become that - had Palpatine wanted it, which I doubt he would've.
Well we appear to be debating a meaningless distinction here, whether or not Sidious
wanted a successor or not, the fact remains that he attempted to apprentice beings that could succeed him, if not sought them out.
In fact, if we consider those Sidious attempted to make his right hand (without alterior motive) Maul - out of Anakin, Luke, Marek and seemingly Talzin - is the odd one out, despite having been Palpatine's first choice. Why would he lower his standards in this case, unless Maul was of the same stock?