Beniboybling
Worst Member
Right, I never once said you are not entitled to your opinion on the matter, and if you ever have a child that ends up identifying as trans, you should retain that right. 👆
What I said is that when it concerns treatment that could have potentially life-saving implications for the patient (and at the very least spare them from serious life-impacting trauma) the state has no right to intervene in the decision, and should butt out.
Nonetheless spotted those links (my bad for missing them), and I have to say the results are rather sketchy, at least for the narrative you are pushing.
In the first study they only polled 25 people, which leaves a fairly large margin for error, and in the second study though they polled over twice as much, 30% of the pool didn't report back, and almost a third of those who did still identified as trans! Moreover, the initial polling in both cases took place at a mean age of around 8, both of those studies failing to glean whether or not all those individuals ceased to identify as gender dysphoric by the onset of puberty. Be aware that some of these kids are as young as five. Finally, the second study found that "children with persistent GID are characterized by more extreme gender dysphoria in childhood than children with desisting gender dysphoria" - so your claim that "it's too early to tell" pre-puberty doesn't appear to hold water.
Certainly parents should be made aware of these facts, but it's certainly not sufficient grounds to deny treatment altogether.