Supergirl vs. MCU Thor

Originally posted by FrothByte
I seriously hope you're joking with your first answer. Because if not then you'd be a ridiculous hypocrite considering the fact that you've tried using physics formulas dozens of times throughout your arguments.

I'll repeat.

You can't use physics to DISCREDIT feats. Otherwise, most feats can be discredited.

You can use them to quantify them only.

Lastly, any feats dealing with the ground automatically gets a pass. In other words, we disregard physics applied to the ground when analyzing feats.
Same goes with clothes, etc.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'll repeat.

You can't use physics to DISCREDIT feats. Otherwise, most feats can be discredited.

You can use them to quantify them only.

Lastly, any feats dealing with the ground automatically gets a pass. In other words, we disregard physics applied to the ground when analyzing feats.
Same goes with clothes, etc.

Says the guy who tried to use physics to discredit feats from WS, Cap and BP.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'll repeat.

You can't use physics to DISCREDIT feats. Otherwise, most feats can be discredited.

You can use them to quantify them only.

Lastly, any feats dealing with the ground automatically gets a pass. In other words, we disregard physics applied to the ground when analyzing feats.
Same goes with clothes, etc.

Lol. This is probably the stupidest argument I've ever heard. So stupid in fact that I'm convinced you're trolling and probably laughing your ass off as you wrote that sentence. No way anyone is stupid enough to take that argument seriously.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Lol. This is probably the stupidest argument I've ever heard. So stupid in fact that I'm convinced you're trolling and probably laughing your ass off as you wrote that sentence. No way anyone is stupid enough to take that argument seriously.

Most feats can be discredited if we apply physics to do them.
Physics is used to quantify feats, not disqualify them (going against writer's intentions).

Originally posted by h1a8
If you are serious then you have very low intelligence. Everything I said is crystal clear and makes perfect sense.

Most feats can be discredited if we apply physics to do them.
Physics is used to quantify feats, not disqualify them (going against writer's intentions).

So why not use physics to quantify the key feat?

Might as well drop that point. H1 will never admit he was wrong (like pretty much everyone else here) so best to move on. Supergirl won't be hitting with millions of tons of force and Thor will curb her. The end 👆

Originally posted by juggerman
Might as well drop that point. H1 will never admit he was wrong (like pretty much everyone else here) so best to move on. Supergirl won't be hitting with millions of tons of force and Thor will curb her. The end 👆

At least we don't make stupid bogus rules like "Physics only works to prove something, not to disprove something. Oh except when talking about clothes and the ground. Because physics never applies to those".

True. Also I like how he claims Jimmy can't possibly be lying but Cap pushing bulldozer HAS to be a lie 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
True. Also I like how he claims Jimmy can't possibly be lying but Cap pushing bulldozer HAS to be a lie 😂

facepalm

That's such a blatant double standard he's using. How can he not see it?

He sees it

Originally posted by Darth Thor
facepalm

That's such a blatant double standard he's using. How can he not see it?

Like also yelling "feats don't prove/quantify feats cuz inconsistencies!" when someone draws comparisons between feats that don't suit his arguments, but will then go and scale characters like Nolan Ra's and Bane's skill, speed and durability off of Batman's other combat feats by *gasp* drawing comparisons between feats?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
facepalm

That's such a blatant double standard he's using. How can he not see it?

It's not. One is possible and the other isn't. I never said it was a fact that the trainer was lying. I took it as he was lying because Cap can't even push a bulldozer. I could be wrong though.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Like also yelling "feats don't prove/quantify feats cuz inconsistencies!" when someone draws comparisons between feats that don't suit his arguments, but will then go and scale characters like Nolan Ra's and Bane's skill, speed and durability off of Batman's other combat feats by *gasp* drawing comparisons between feats?

There is no inconsistency. If so then clearly explain (in easy language) what is the inconsistency.

Originally posted by juggerman
True. Also I like how he claims Jimmy can't possibly be lying but Cap pushing bulldozer HAS to be a lie 😂

I said it was possible to be a lie. It's not possible that Jimmy was lying.
Neither feat can be used due to PIS.

Originally posted by FrothByte
At least we don't make stupid bogus rules like "Physics only works to prove something, not to disprove something. Oh except when talking about clothes and the ground. Because physics never applies to those".

That's not a bogus rule. It's a truth.

Do you agree that most feats can be discredited if we apply real physics to them?

Originally posted by juggerman
Might as well drop that point. H1 will never admit he was wrong (like pretty much everyone else here) so best to move on. Supergirl won't be hitting with millions of tons of force and Thor will curb her. The end 👆

I was never wrong.
If you think so then what was I wrong about?

^ prove that physics doesn't work on clothes or the ground.

Originally posted by h1a8
There is no inconsistency. If so then clearly explain (in easy language) what is the inconsistency.

Wow... I have to believe that you are trolling at this point. Because no one with a with any sense (or grasp of the English language) could misunderstand my comment as completely as your post implies you have.

Why is it impossible for Jimmy to have either been lying or wrong?

Originally posted by FrothByte
^ prove that physics doesn't work on clothes or the ground.

Using real physics then a being can't forward throw an object far heavier than them. Their feet have to be stuck to the ground.

I being can't lift things that weigh many tons without causing damage to the ground with their feet.

Deathlok shouldn't be unable to push the bulldozer no matter how strong he is (his maximum static friction on his feet is too little).

Hulk couldn't slam Loki with considerably more force than Hulk weighs without being moved considerably (lifted or pushed back).
Clothes will have considerable damage in many situations (blasts, falls, etc).

I can go on and on.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Wow... I have to believe that you are trolling at this point. Because no one with a with any sense (or grasp of the English language) could misunderstand my comment as completely as your post implies you have.

Yet you can't give us one clear example of one.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why is it impossible for Jimmy to have either been lying or wrong?

Well?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Well?

Originally posted by h1a8
Simple. Because the writer didn't want him to.

Are you the writer?