How the hell can Superman beat Silver Surfer?

Started by darthgoober22 pages

Originally posted by abhilegend
Except when it's the only thing mentioned as a product.

Surfer didn't "generate" an energy blast, he "generated" a black hole.

If you want, I can make it even simpler smurphy.

Except that's just contradictory. But at least you amended that the creation of the black hole was main goal.

It's a start.


Read what Thanos said, the black hole was brought about by Surfer's energy discharge.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Are you really still railing against the term? You offered to get a mod ruling on it and I said I was totally cool with that. Go ahead and get their input on the matter.
I'll get to that, after I make Smurph look stupid for a bit.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Read what Thanos said, the black hole was brought about by Surfer's energy discharge.
What's the primary effect of the energy discharge?

Couldn't there be some rules to use this feats weather they are myth or not.

First to see if they are true and then to be accepted on the forum as a rule?

Try to debunk or prove a feat pro side makes case, con side makes case, get some judges and see if the feat will be used in the forum.

Originally posted by Ambient
Nothing imaginary about it bru, I posted a scan about it a while back and it was in the Annihilation story and also in Morgs annihilation bio.

Except it doesn't matches the story.

A bio doesn't retcon what's on panel. WOL Morg wouldn't struggle against Terrax twice.

Originally posted by darthgoober
No they always matter to some degree, just like character comparisons. I freely acknowledge that basically everything in comics has to be taken with a grain of salt, but that's far different than suggesting that either category isn't worth considering.

So it doesn't matters when it suits you.

Gotcha.

Originally posted by Philosophía
What's the primary effect of the energy discharge?

An explosion

Originally posted by darthgoober
Read what Thanos said, the black hole was brought about by Surfer's energy discharge.

Nobody said otherwise doofus.

😬

Originally posted by darthgoober
An explosion
Surfer wanted to create an explosion, not a black hole?

Originally posted by darthgoober
An explosion

Which didn't happen. We see debris sucked in and not flying outwards like other explosion he caused.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Here.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=641900&pagenumber=1#post16177954

Got it. Seems to be the complete scene, unless someone wants to throw in some additional context.

This is clearly, and I mean clearly, the intended effect Surfer was going for.

I think the language confusion people are experiencing is the difference between "side effect" and "consequence".

To be clear, this is not a "side effect", which is by definition a secondary effect which is further implied to be negative. Secondary being not primary, and primary being the intended effect.

This is a "consequence", which is defined by being the result of something. A consequence is often thought of as carrying a negative connotation, such as "if you commit a crime, there will be legal consequences", but a consequence is not limited by its definition to being negative. A consequence of drinking milk may be stronger bones. A consequence of doing extra work may be a promotion. A consequence of a large energy discharge may be a black hole (in Marvel anyways, fuck physics).

But anyways, fuck all y'all, getting caught up in semantics 😬

Originally posted by Philosophía
Why is it a side-effect, when the intent of my action is specifically for that effect?

Tell me, smurphy, what is the primary effect of Silver Surfer's blast, so that the side-effect is the black hole?

How would he do it in a non-roundabout way?

A massive energy discharge, obviously. Which is why Thanos said that the black hole was "brought about by Surfer's blast" or w/e

Originally posted by abhilegend
Surfer didn't "generate" an energy blast
Hahaha what?

Of course he did.

Originally posted by Cogito
Got it. Seems to be the complete scene, unless someone wants to throw in some additional context.

This is clearly, and I mean [b]clearly, the intended effect Surfer was going for.

I think the language confusion people are experiencing is the difference between "side effect" and "consequence".

To be clear, this is not a "side effect", which is by definition a secondary effect which is further implied to be negative. Secondary being not primary, and primary being the intended effect.

This is a "consequence", which is defined by being the result of something. A consequence is often thought of as carrying a negative connotation, such as "if you commit a crime, there will be legal consequences", but a consequence is not limited by its definition to being negative. A consequence of drinking milk may be stronger bones. A consequence of doing extra work may be a promotion. A consequence of a large energy discharge may be a black hole (in Marvel anyways, fuck physics).

But anyways, fuck all y'all, getting caught up in semantics 😬 [/B]

Nah, bro, you're wrong.

Goober and Smurph am zmart.

Originally posted by Smurph
A massive energy discharge, obviously. Which is why Thanos said that the black hole was "brought about by Surfer's blast" or w/e
So the primary effect of the massive energy discharge is what, if the side effect is the black hole?

Originally posted by Smurph

Hahaha what?

Of course he did.


Except he didn't. That's what the recap says.

Don't tell me you didn't read that . Do I need to put some reading glasses there?

Originally posted by abhilegend
So it doesn't matters when it suits you.

Gotcha.


lol Relatively little of what's discussed on the forum is definitive, it always boils down to a subject interpretation of things. That's why this is a debate forum rather than a "everybody chime in and say the exact same thing" forum. There are things that I ignore in accordance with my interpretation of the rules of the forum and there are things I recognize for the same reason.

Originally posted by Smurph
A massive energy discharge

A massive energy discharge is an action (a verb), and not an effect (a noun) 👆

Originally posted by darthgoober
lol Relatively little of what's discussed on the forum is definitive, it always boils down to a subject interpretation of things. That's why this is a debate forum rather than a "everybody chime in and say the exact same thing" forum. There are things that I ignore in accordance with my interpretation of the rules of the forum and there are things I recognize for the same reason.

So it matters for Surfer and not for Superman?

Gotcha.

Originally posted by Philosophía
He's a troll, pay him no attention. Ignore list is the way to go.

Lol so bringing up a feat is trolling?

Discharge.

Huehuhehuehue

Originally posted by Philosophía
Surfer wanted to create an explosion, not a black hole?

Surfer wanted to create and explosion which would result in a black hole being formed.