Originally posted by leonidas
i already showed that the 7th ended unnaturally early... we saw the first was actively destroyed, so....that obviously isn't a natural ending either. the 6th ended without outside interference, hence the reason its ending was natural. 😕
No! The panels you posted in your previous replied weren't clear and showed nothing. I forgot to tell you that. Okay as you said yourself, the ending of the 1st Multiverse isn't natural neither? That means that the Ending of the Multiverse doesn't have to be natural! It can happen in any way! The fact that the Multiverse is ending doesn't mean there is an imbalance! The Tribunal HAD NO CASE. Else prove me otherwise.
Originally posted by leonidas beyonders>lt i agree. the multiverse died prematurely and lt couldn't stop it. why? because the beyonders were too strong. suggesting that the beyonders were toaa's erasers (utterly unfounded), or that toaa willed it to happen (also totally unfounded) is just...excuse making. it's no more insightful than saying the writers let lt lose. well...yeah, no kidding. it's a ludicrous statement and stance.[/B]
Again show me where it says that the Multiverse was dying prematurely? Either way, prematurely or not it changes nothing. Take it as a normal organism. There is natural death and there is unnatural death! It is still death and it's a natural thing. No cosmic imbalance broken.
I also answered that point. The Beyonders are from beyond, and not from within the Multiverse. They don't represent a Cosmic Imbalance.
Now, my statement isn't UNFOUNDED. TOAA is from outside the Multiverse just as the Beyonders are. TOAA is as said TOAA. So far we are let to believe he created EVERYTHING and that hasn't change. EVERYTHING still includes the BEYONDERS. The purpose they were created is unknown. I just gave a possible reason.
Originally posted by leonidas sure, but i'll side with what has been shown on panel over wide-reaching speculation every time. /shrug[/B]
Ofcourse but since there are NO PANELS to prove or disprove my claims then we need to rely on speculations. And a speculation with evidence to support it but not to prove it is a Theory. And when Theories are concerned the MOST LOGICAL ones are the ones which PREVAIL.