Originally posted by Darth ThorBoth disagreed with the other. No one clearly won the fight. That’s the point they left it open ended to appease both fan bases. You’re too biased for Thor to discuss Thor despite initially believing without the hammer he’s incredibly weak nonsense I tried telling you. Hulk has advantages as does Thor and the fights have always been pretty competitive in the comics and now in the films.
Actually Hulk didnt disagree. But to act like Hulks rants are as reliable as Thor talking seriously is beyond laughable.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderThat doesn’t prove anything. It’s like saying Drax has better feat but we know logically Hulk is the physical brute. It’s silly. We have seen Thor in the same exact situations fare worse than the Hulk. Thanos affected Thor far easier than the Hulk. Thor couldn’t even budge Thanos with a cheapshot and a weapon. Hulk affected him a lot more so.
What is Hulks greatest feat of durability?
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderHulk looks better in comparison. That’s what determines superiority not feats. You already said you just screw around and don’t take this seriously, loser.
So the fact of the matter is that Hulk has no feat on par with tanking a Neutron Star...Thor is superior as pertains durability as a result...
Originally posted by quanchi112
That doesn’t prove anything. It’s like saying Drax has better feat but we know logically Hulk is the physical brute. It’s silly. We have seen Thor in the same exact situations fare worse than the Hulk. Thanos affected Thor far easier than the Hulk. Thor couldn’t even budge Thanos with a cheapshot and a weapon. Hulk affected him a lot more so.
It proves a lot...
It proves that Thor has a greater feat of durability than the Hulk by a very wide margin...
Feats are quantifiable...
Simply saying someone is more durable than someone else with nothing quantifiable to back it up is foolish...
Based on feats, Thor's durability is greater than Hulks...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderThis doesn’t my prove hulk can’t do so. Comparisons prove who is superior. Hulk already looks better when in the same situation therefore Hulk imo definitely does so and longer since he’s stronger and more durable. Logic.
It proves a lot...It proves that Thor has a greater feat of durability than the Hulk by a very wide margin...
Feats are quantifiable...
Simply saying someone is more durable than someone else with nothing quantifiable to back it up is foolish...
Based on feats, Thor's durability is greater than Hulks...
Based off logic and their screen history Hulk is more durable and stronger. 😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk looks better in comparison. That’s what determines superiority not feats. You already said you just screw around and don’t take this seriously, loser.
Enough with your blah, blah, blah, talk...
If you cant back up Hulk having greater durability than Thor with feats, then you have nothing more than talk...
Thor has the single greatest feat of durability a hero in the MCU has demonstrated in his favor...
Check it out for yourself:
Originally posted by quanchi112
This doesn’t my prove hulk can’t do so. Comparisons prove who is superior. Hulk already looks better when in the same situation therefore Hulk imo definitely does so and longer since he’s stronger and more durable. Logic.Based off logic and their screen history Hulk is more durable and stronger. 😂
Excellent, so show me Hulk withstanding the force of a neutron star...
Go ahead...
I'll wait...
🙂
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Nah, it's definitely iyo because I haven't seen anyone else interpreting those scenes that way. It doesn't even make sense my friend.