Originally posted by -Pr-
What I'm saying is that Arthur doesn't need to be compared to Maxima or Diana. His feats stand up on their own. As do Orion's.Anyone who uses fights with Superman as ABC logic to prove how great Orion is, is just as bad as anyone trying to downplay Aquaman.
I don't mind people using fights to help their argument, but this thread is turning in to "Is Arthur Diana's equal", which is not what it's supposed to be.
And yes, the weird lowballing has to stop too. Of both character on the board.
Appreciate the explanation. I think to some extent fights help determine where a character stands in the universe and I’d agree with anyone who said Orion is a peer to Superman. I don’t think their on par physically but I think there peers while I think by consistency at this point Aquaman and Diana are peers.
Scaling gets wacky as hell though and Abhilegend had a point on the Batman thing on the fact that based off fights Batman has been in we could legitimately argue Batman as a teambuster who can take on teams consisting of high tiers. My issue though is that’s not the intent for Batman who is consistently treated as a street level character whereas Aquaman has been stated and shown multiple times over to be peers with Diana and regarded as one of the strongest people on the planet. I don’t get why anyone has an issue with that at this point since it’s been pretty consistent for the last 10 years.
I don’t think statements are the end all say all in a versus debate but I do think they help paint a picture alongside personal feats and scaling. Which Aquaman has all that. The idea that Orion oneshots Aquaman is what initially bothered me though and based off the fights Aquaman has had against other characters, the level Aquaman is regarded in and his own personal feats I’d question the idea of Orion doing such a thing.