batdude123
Fellow Tu Quoqumber
See, this is EXACTLY the type of shit I was talking about.
Smh... facepalm
Originally posted by Q99
Ehhhh... no. Those people are significantly more melee skill focused than Superman, especially Aquaman
Why? Are Arthur's punches somehow more effective than Superman's just because he's a "WARYA KEENG!!!"?
Hell, Batman punked his ass in h2h despite his ridiculously inferior stats.
There's no justification for him being a tier above Superman. Next.
Originally posted by Q99
Herc
Hercules is basically a brawler with some wrestling skills. While that may get others wet, it doesn't impress me enough to think he belongs in a tier above Superman.
Originally posted by Q99
Thor
Right, because like, he totallyz showz his martial artz skillz in his fites wit DA HULKERZZ!!!11
Honest to God, Thor's skills as a fighter are probably the most unjustifiably over-hyped of anybody on KMC. He's nothing more than a glorified brawler, and yet somehow, he's made out to be this fighting dynamo.
Originally posted by Q99
BRB.
Again, an over-glorified brawler, but because of his connection to Thor, he's somehow in a tier above Superman.
Originally posted by Q99
Loki, despite his apparent focus on magic, is a masterful combatant and recently dealt with a large group of armed and highly skilled foes who were as strong or stronger than him, largely through melee skill.
"MASTERFUL COMBATANT"???!!! Really? Somebody shows a few scans of Loki sword fighting, and everyone creams his whitey tighties. Sure, let's pretend like this isn't the same guy who's run away from physical encounters before.
This is a perfect example of what I was talking about earlier. Everybody's willing to give the benefit of the doubt to those not named "Superman." What a joke.
Originally posted by Q99
Doom's got a few good hand to hand feats unarmored like taking out a lion, which is the only reason he's not bumped down.
That's Doom's justification? Because he has a single showing where he defeats a lion? That somehow makes him a more skilled fighter than Superman?
How about when a depowered Superman took down numerous parademons? Or when a depowered Superman help take down a LORD OF CHAOS?!
These points are getting progressively worse.
Originally posted by Q99
If you think they don't deserve their spot, vote them down, and I can see arguments for doing so in some cases. I think it makes more sense than voting Superman up, because there's quite a few fourth tiers more skilled than him.
Like I said before, if you're going to try and reach in order to justify the position of the multiple combatants that I listed despite inferior feats of skill, then it makes more sense for Superman to move up rather than have all of them move down.
Originally posted by Q99
It's like, say, Green Arrow and Hawkeye and bows. If archery skill counted, they've be top tier, but only martial arts skill does. Superman has great move-at-super-speed, precisely-apply-super-strength, pin-point-target-with-super-vision, combat-flight, etc. skills, but that's something else. He can't pull off nerve hits without those powers, and I can't think of anything he's done non-powered that Batgirl/Barbara Gordon couldn't do.
Lawlz? What is it with you and marwash trying to use examples that aren't even close to being analogous to the topic at hand?
Originally posted by Q99
Superman's one of the best there is at using his powers, with only a few even coming close. His martial arts skills, however, are less-so, and a lot of his better martial arts feats are reliant on said powers, and he gets depowered often enough for us to see how good he is without them.
In spite of better feats than the above mentioned.
K.