Originally posted by quanchi112
Others have also said it. It was a joke you nerded out.
Not really, you're just grasping at straws. And ignoring irony having its way with you.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Cease with the insults. I am taking lighthearted jabs here but you're just straight bashing.
Except, it's not bashing. Maybe you're just doing this whole act for shits and giggles, which I've pointed-out. But if you're not? What I said is entirely valid.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You were wrong. Just accept defeat and move on.
I wasn't wrong, nor was I defeated. You're continuing to turn something into a "victory" because you have to argue for the sake of argument. Your argument was a strawman anyways, so your claim to victory is even more pathetic.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you now believe he's more durable than Superman. Ok.
I was simply pointing-out an example of someone who IS in fact mystical showing no greater resistance than Superman to the tiara. But it's irrelevant as the tiara is a straight-up strawman and you refuse to admit it, even though it's clear as can be.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Her objects which are magical do so. Her punches aren't as strong as his punches and he's more durable so that negates the mystical advantage in this instance. She relies on formidability through skill because he's stronger and more durable than she is. The magical advantage is taken away and negated by these two advantages for Superman in this case.
The problem here is you've proven nothing that her punches effect him more than someone equivalently as strong but non-mystical. All the examples of the tiara and whatnot are strawmen, and the fact that you're focusing on Wonder Woman(while failing to prove your claim) and ignoring the other examples I gave just proves you've got nothing.
Originally posted by quanchi112
And he tries to kill her on panel. On one instance you say the statements don't add up and here is a case of your own logic thrown in your face here. He tried to kill her by throwing her into the sun. He wanted her/him to suffer first but trying to throw someone into the sun is trying to kill that person. He wanted her/him to suffer but wasn't holding back and actually tried to kill her/him. Irony.
Wrong. He didn't try to kill her. He wanted to make Doomsday suffer, first. He was trying to make Doomsday suffer. Her statements that he would have killed her don't mean shit because Doomsday would survive in the Sun. The argument is he was going all-out. He was not. Plus you're just arguing strawmen anyways.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said it did. Her tiara is comparable to a tiara. Her punches aren't as strong as Superman's and the advantage is diminished due to him being stronger than she is and more durable in general. Your logic says any tiara could cut his throat open which is laughable.
Which is it, Quanchi? Do you have poor reading comprehension, or are you INTENTIONALLY ignoring what I had to say? I said enchanted blades will cut him, not the strawman bullshit you're pulling. You're claiming that she's got some edge against him in pure weaponless hand-to-hand simply because she's magick. I pointed-out that her punches have no more effect on him than someone equally as strong but non-mystical, and you've done nothing but thrown-out strawmen.
Tell me Quanny, where is he hurt anymore by this--
--than this--
? Both are him being hit with enough force to send him to the Moon. One is by an energy blast, the other by the punch of a demon. So, where is he hurt more, again?
Originally posted by quanchi112
I gave you one example where his strength is a problem because it's [B]magical in nature. That's a direct example proving you wrong. Stew on it. Your examples lacked objectivity and were delusional to say the least.[/B]
Not really. You referred to a questionable example. I remember hearing about it and when I saw it, I went, "uhhh People sure either miss or leave-out context."
Originally posted by quanchi112
You're biased to the point of hilarity. I bring up examples and seem to understand him far better than you do. You think all tiaras can slice him open. 🙂
I just love seeing you prove your inability to recognize irony doing horrible, unspeakable things to you.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You're Michael Myers angry.
Nope, not at all. If I were, wouldn't I have tracked you down and hacked you to bits by now? Also, kinda surprising for you to use THAT reference. What? Is there a new movie in the works that actually has people talking about the franchise again?
Originally posted by quanchi112
The Thanos Sourcebook is a comic which you cited is evidence. It's a body of work which covers his canon appearances. It isn't canon for him. By your own criteria it works. Thanos thanks you for your concession.
You clearly have "won" in your delusional mind, but you've all but admitted that you have no proof. Squirrel Girl made Thanos her b!tch.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Why are we seeing Supe's durability feats? Let's see some striking power!*takes out more popcorn*
'Cuz Quanchi thinks that Thor's punches will have more of an effect than someone equivalently strong but non-mystical in origin, simply because Thor's magick.
So, I gave a comparison of two similar examples of Superman being hit with enough force to get sent to the Moon, one by an energy blast, another by a punch from a demon. Do keep up. 😒
Originally posted by Delta1938
'Cuz Quanchi thinks that Thor's punches will have more of an effect than someone equivalently strong but non-mystical in origin, simply because Thor's magick.So, I gave a comparison of two similar examples of Superman being hit with enough force to get sent to the Moon, one by an energy blast, another by a punch from a demon. Do keep up. 😒
duh... I was just trying to push the thread back on the main topic and not go off into anymore tangents.
Originally posted by Delta1938
Considering that Quanchi thinks Thor's mystical nature will give him an advantage in any sort of punching contest, isn't this relevant to the topic?
u guys did go off into more than that... Only fair we see some striking feats from Supe's side since NES has given some examples. u've been nominated because u have been the busiest poster for Kal... 😄
Originally posted by Delta1938No, you're wrong and angry.
Not really, you're just grasping at straws. And ignoring irony having its way with you.
That's called bashing. You don't know what the word means. Obviously.
Except, it's not bashing. Maybe you're just doing this whole act for shits and giggles, which I've pointed-out. But if you're not? What I said is entirely valid.[/B]
You ignore context while I champion it. That's why I am consistent while you are inconsistent.
I wasn't wrong, nor was I defeated. You're continuing to turn something into a "victory" because you have to argue for the sake of argument. Your argument was a strawman anyways, so your claim to victory is even more pathetic.[/B]
You want to ignore the other variables at play while magic has always been a weakness of Superman's.
I was simply pointing-out an example of someone who IS in fact mystical showing no greater resistance than Superman to the tiara. But it's irrelevant as the tiara is a straight-up strawman and you refuse to admit it, even though it's clear as can be.[/B]
It's been cited more than once. Her tiara sliced through his flesh like warm butter because it's mystical in nature. Her punches don't overcome the fact she is less powerful and he's more durable than she is. She also held back.
The problem here is you've proven nothing that her punches effect him more than someone equivalently as strong but non-mystical. All the examples of the tiara and whatnot are strawmen, and the fact that you're focusing on Wonder Woman(while failing to prove your claim) and ignoring the other examples I gave just proves you've got nothing.[/B]
Superman tried throwing her/him into the sun. She stopped the attack but you're lying now. He went all out and every attack wasn't meant to hold back at all. Doomsday might might survive in the sun initially and nor was it ever evident he would have survived.
Wrong. He didn't try to kill her. He wanted to make Doomsday suffer, first. He was trying to make Doomsday suffer. Her statements that he would have killed her don't mean shit because Doomsday would survive in the Sun. The argument is he was going all-out. He was not. Plus you're just arguing strawmen anyways.[/B]
I have excellent reading comprehension while you yourself don't have any skills in this department.Which is it, Quanchi? Do you have poor reading comprehension, or are you INTENTIONALLY ignoring what I had to say? I said enchanted blades will cut him, not the strawman bullshit you're pulling. You're claiming that she's got some edge against him in pure weaponless hand-to-hand simply because she's magick. I pointed-out that her punches have no more effect on him than someone equally as strong but non-mystical, and you've done nothing but thrown-out strawmen.[/B]
Punches do have a better effect since he's less vulnerable to magic than nonmagic. That's been stated numerous times.
Showings vary. Sometimes k-nite hurts him more according to one writer than another. Sometimes red solar energy depowers him more than other times. It isn't consistent writer to writer but what is consistent is his weakness to it. I hope you enjoyed your lesson in common sense, kiddo.
Tell me Quanny, where is he hurt anymore by this----than this--
? Both are him being hit with enough force to send him to the Moon. One is by an energy blast, the other by the punch of a demon. So, where is he hurt more, again?
Not really. You referred to a questionable example. I remember hearing about it and when I saw it, I went, "uhhh People sure either miss or leave-out context."[/B]
You're mentally weak.I just love seeing you prove your inability to recognize irony doing horrible, unspeakable things to you.[/B]
I bet I am in better shape than you. I bet I could outperform you physically as well as the mental laps I ran around you.
Nope, not at all. If I were, wouldn't I have tracked you down and hacked you to bits by now? Also, kinda surprising for you to use THAT reference. What? Is there a new movie in the works that actually has people talking about the franchise again?[/B]
Thanos Sourcebook says otherwise as do I. My opinion won't change.You clearly have "won" in your delusional mind, but you've all but admitted that you have no proof. Squirrel Girl made Thanos her b!tch. [/B]
🙂
Originally posted by Silent MasterThat's irrelevant. This sourcebook dealt with all of Thanos' canon appearances and since it wasn't in here nor was it mentioned elsewhere I don't believe it's canon. You are free to think what you want I don't just make things up I always back my opinion. 🙂
Just to humor you, where exactly does Marvel state that not being mentioned in the sourcebook = not canon?