Superman vs Thor (punching contest)

Started by quanchi11220 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, Just to humor you, where exactly does Marvel state that not being mentioned in the sourcebook = not canon?
They don't have to since his showings were all included in the Thanos Sourcebook.

IOW, Marvel never stated it, which means you're making things up...otherwise known as lying.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, Marvel never stated it, which means you're making things up...otherwise known as lying.
If marvel released it then what does that tell you ? I mean seriously, kiddo.

Marvel never stated that being left out of a sourcebook means that an event is non-canon.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Marvel never stated that being left out of a sourcebook means that an event is non-canon.
So marvel released a sourcebook for fans to ignore ? Do you really think marvel cares what rules battleboards have in place ? You're making me laugh.

Again, Marvel never stated that being left out of a sourcebook means that an event is non-canon.

The idea that being left out of a sourcebook = non-canon is a Quan stance, not a Marvel stance.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, Marvel never stated that being left out of a sourcebook means that an event is non-canon.
Why would they need to say such a thing ?
Originally posted by Silent Master
The idea that being left out of a sourcebook = non-canon is a Quan stance, not a Marvel stance.
If the purpose of the book is to go over what's in continuity for Thanos why would they need to reiterate it ?

WTF.

The relevance of the Destroyer of All That Breathes versus Thanos has no bearing here.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why would they need to say such a thing ? If the purpose of the book is to go over what's in continuity for Thanos why would they need to reiterate it ?

None of that changes the fact that the idea that being left out of a sourcebook = non-canon is a Quan stance, not a Marvel stance.

Originally posted by Silent Master
None of that changes the fact that the idea that being left out of a sourcebook = non-canon is a Quan stance, not a Marvel stance.
Jake's right this doesn't have a place here. I believe the comic was created to show his adventures in continuity. You don't think this book matters at all. I do. You have my opinion as I have yours. It isn't changing nor is it relevant here. 🙂

Marvel policy isn't effected by what you believe, so until you can provide actual proof, Squirrel Girl has a win over the real Thanos.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Marvel policy isn't effected by what you believe, so until you can provide actual proof, Squirrel Girl has a win over the real Thanos.
Tell me what Marvel's policy is. You keep acting like you know so why don't you explain to me what their policy is.

Still waitin on Supe's striking feats... sigh.......

Originally posted by quanchi112
Tell me what Marvel's policy is. You keep acting like you know so why don't you explain to me what their policy is.

You actually need to be told that events that happen in canon books are canon?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You actually need to be told that events that happen in canon books are canon?
Is the Thanos Sourcebook discussing canon appearances ? Now explain to me what is marvel's official policy. You brought it up so please explain it to me. If you can't cite a source then you lied.

I like how you're trying to move the argument away from the fact that you have zero proof that the Squirrel Girl/Thanos fight is non-canon.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I like how you're trying to move the argument away from the fact that you have zero proof that the Squirrel Girl/Thanos fight is non-canon.
You made a claim that you knew marvel's official policy and are shrinking from your claims. Concession accepted. Not canon.

You have zero proof that the Squirrel Girl/Thanos fight is non-canon.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You have zero proof that the Squirrel Girl/Thanos fight is non-canon.
Thanos Sourcebook.