Originally posted by Silent MasterWhy would they need to say such a thing ?
Again, Marvel never stated that being left out of a sourcebook means that an event is non-canon.
Originally posted by Silent MasterIf the purpose of the book is to go over what's in continuity for Thanos why would they need to reiterate it ?
The idea that being left out of a sourcebook = non-canon is a Quan stance, not a Marvel stance.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Why would they need to say such a thing ? If the purpose of the book is to go over what's in continuity for Thanos why would they need to reiterate it ?
None of that changes the fact that the idea that being left out of a sourcebook = non-canon is a Quan stance, not a Marvel stance.
Originally posted by Silent MasterJake's right this doesn't have a place here. I believe the comic was created to show his adventures in continuity. You don't think this book matters at all. I do. You have my opinion as I have yours. It isn't changing nor is it relevant here. 🙂
None of that changes the fact that the idea that being left out of a sourcebook = non-canon is a Quan stance, not a Marvel stance.
Originally posted by Silent MasterIs the Thanos Sourcebook discussing canon appearances ? Now explain to me what is marvel's official policy. You brought it up so please explain it to me. If you can't cite a source then you lied.
You actually need to be told that events that happen in canon books are canon?