1/2
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Dooku never fought evenly with Sidious though, so what is your point? He never even fought evenly with Yoda, despite having his powers amped on Vjun.And don't bring up the time he fought Windu and Kenobi. Evidently Dooku had some help during that encounter, and was also outmatched, which is why he fled, so Idk why that means anything. Furthermore, we don't even know the full context of that encounter.
My point is that Dooku did fight Yoda evenly. In film they circle around exchanging blows, neither giving ground. Dooku did not do a single step back, whole fight his posture was in perfect balance. In script Yoda has edge but only because Dooku's attacks became "slow" and "feeble" as result of fatique.
I will bring up fight with Windu and Kenobi. In game it is clear that Dooku engages them alone after magnaguards are finished already. Specifics are unknown but, if Dooku was not at least on parr with Windu as Yoda claimed, he would simply run away.
Magnaguards do not complete the superconductive loop of vaapad, so no he didn't. Windu was fighting at a level he had never fought in in his life when he fought Sidious.
Nice try, Vaapad works equally good even against blasterfire attacks:
Most had at least seven. It was not uncommon for them to have as many as twelve. The largest ever killed had twenty-one. The thing about a Vaapad was that you never knew how many tentacles it had until it was dead: they moved too fast to count. Almost too fast to see.So did Mace's.
Energy sprayed around him, but only splatters of it grazed him here and there; the rest went back at the gunship
.
And you make naked assumption that Windu never fought at the same level like against Sidious. He was blitzing Kar Vastor:
But where Vastor's speed was blinding, Mace's was invisible. Not one of those slaps connected. Before Vastor could even focus his eyes, Mace had hit him six times: two thundering hooks to his short ribs, a knee slamming hard into the same thigh he'd hit before, an elbow snapping up to the point of his chin, and two devastating palm strikes to either hinge of his jaw.
This is called Vaapad, Kar." A fierce light burned in Mace's eyes. "How many arms do you see?
Vaapad, also, works equally well against Jedi:Depa's blade was everywhere.
Mace backpedaled, parrying frantically, absorbing the shock of her attacks with bent arms and a two-handed grip. He was taller than she, with more reach and weight, and vastly more muscle in his upper body, but she drove him backward as though he were a child.
In any case you are wrong to claim that Windu didn't submerge in Vaapad fighting droids because he can fully submerge in Vaapad regardless of who he fights:
Bolts splintered off in all directions; the erratic staccato of badly aimed shots took all his concentration and skill to intercept. Mace sank deeper and deeper into the Force, surrendering more and more of his conscious thought to the instinctive whirl of Vaapad, and even so some bolts slipped past him and whanged randomly around the inside of the bunker.
He was too deep in Vaapad to make a plan, too deep even to think, but he was a Jedi Master: he didn't have to think.
As you see even deflecting blaster bolts Windu can be too deep in Vaapad even to think.
I did, but all you're doing is saying stuff like "well nuh uh 'cause Yoda can't kill Dooku with the force so he has no need to use it and the novel says Yoda was swinging hard and his blade work was better than Anakin's and Kenobi's"
Wait a second. For you Yoda not using Force offensively means he held back? 😄
Using it as factor fails miserably. Because Windu and DE Luke in final fight did not use Force offensively against Sidious.
On top of that it contradicts your claim that Sidious held back against Maul because he used TK offensively on Maul three times and added lightning to it.
As of Yoda, he Force handled Ventress with no intention to kill. Yet, he didn't try to do the same to Dooku. And it makes sence that such attempt would not succeed because Dooku has greater TK feats than Yoda.
In any case holding back on Force attacks simply does not equate to holding back in general. Sidious held back on Force attacks, when slaying masters and driving back Windu. Did he hold back? No. Similarly, Yoda held back on Force but tried to overwhelm with lightsaber instead.
But hey, you're also the one who says that the hyperbolic statement "whirlwind of destruction" means one is fighting their absolute hardest. 😆
Yes, I am the one saying that. Word "destruction" cannot be applied to holding back character because they are not willing to destroy on first place.
First of all, why are you using a source which shows that Yoda was getting the best of Dooku to support your argument that they were fighting evenly? Second of all the fight is told through Dooku's perspective, I believe.
First of all I use this source because it proves that Yoda did not hold back. And they did fight evenly. The only part, where Yoda took the better of him was, when Dooku lost balance, the rest was just frustration from inability to win. In any case it is overridden in film as Dooku is in perfect balance whole time.
Your believe that it is Dooku's perspective doesn't make it so. It is third person narration, where every single detail is explained. And after Dooku runs away narration continues without him. In any case why would author try to decieve reader? That's just silly excuse.
I already went over this argument:Palpatine ended three jedi masters with fatal blows, Maul ended Qui Gon with a fatal blow, Obi Wan ended Maul with a fatal blow, and I'm pretty sure dark side Anakin cut down a few jedi with fatal blows. (note: all these examples are from the movies alone.) Hmm, I wonder why they didn't just go for the wrists, ya know, since it's so much easier? Perhaps it's because it wasn't an option at the time, so they landed a strike on an opening that was available at the time. That's what you do when you're not limiting yourself.
Hah. Each of them actually had option at the time.
Palpatine could choose to maim all three masters, they were to slow to react anyway. Nothing stopped him from lets say slicing off legs of those masters.
Maul defeated Qui-Gon through non-lethal technique. He hit him with hilt in the face, from that moment he had choice to strike anywhere he wanted, he could chose to chop off limbs instead. Kenobi, also, had choice to strike anywhere he wanted, he simply had no concern for sparing Maul's life.
Your "evidence", if it can be called that way, is refuted rather easily. My turn.
In AotC Dooku intended to kill Kenobi. Yet, he dealed shin damage instead of killing outright.
In film Windu did not make a single attack that could kill Sidious. It was Sidious attacking whole time right until the end, where Windu kicked him.
"It was difficult to learn how to be in a scene being backed up and on defense the whole time". - Samuel L Jackson
Windu limited himself to passive defense and executed non-lethal technique at the end only.
If we go by novel, then again he struck at lightsaber hilt in "precise ark", when easier would be to aim at wrist with no precision.
If you think that the most impresive feats happen with intention to kill, then you are wrong. Luke with no intention to kill handled 6 cortosis armored Jensarai, all were spared life.
Farther from RotS novel:
"He drove a series of flashing thrusts toward Kenobi's legs to draw the Jedi Master into a flipping overhead leap so that Dooku could burn through his spine from kidneys to shoulder".
Dooku deliberately limits his target to legs only.
With Anakin:
"He decides to win.
He decides that Dooku should lose the same hand he took"
Again limitation of target. Not to mention that this decision lacks intention to kill.
Limiting targets does not decrease performance, it is what skilled fighting is about. Practitioner limits targets in order to increase effectiveness. What you fail to understand is that there is no such situation, where fatal body parts are exposed, while non-lethal aren't. Every opening in the defense gives options to strike at several places, it's a matter of choice that does not limit performance at all.
And this:
"Brakiss showed the faintest glimmer of uncertainty in his normally calm and peaceful eyes when Luke drove in, this time intending to win. Luke struck again with the lightsaber, always maintaining his focus and drive, not letting anger take control, doing only what he wished to do.
The Master of the Shadow Academy defended himself and Luke saw his chance to strike. He altered his aim just slightly, not striking the energy blade itself. He could have swung lower to take off the hand of his former student, much as Darth Vader had cut off Luke's own hand-but Luke didn't want to maim Brakiss in such a way. He needed only to ruin his weapon.
His lightsaber struck across the top of Brakiss's handle, just below the terminus of the energy beam and above the knuckles of the grip".
This is yet another brilliant example from Luke that intention to kill is not needed to demonstrate top performance. And it perfectly supports my point that ones there is an opening in defence, it is a matter of choice where to strike. Luke "saw his chance to strike" and he did, no holding back as he used the opportunity, when it arose. No intention to kill, yet, same result, opponent is defeated.