Grievous's lowballing comes from his showing against the Gungans, and because his personality is not as serious as it was in the older cartoons.
Personally, I agree that some of his best feats come from TCW, such as giving Kenobi hell all throughout the series. So I don't understand how most people can wank Kenobi and then turn around and lowball Grievous. If Grievous is that bad, then why does Kenobi, whom everyone considers top tier, consistently struggle against him?
''I mean It's not that big a challenge when Kenobi in the movie Revenge of the Sith finally he gets Grievous on one-to-one terms''.
''It's not the sensibility that people got, you know, unfortunately or not in the previous Micro series where they're all hiding in a ship worried about Grievous is gonna come and stomp on them.''
''If you think of a really well-trained Jedi Knight, that鈥檚 not really a possibility, they are trained against fear, they鈥檙e trained to control their fear and he ultimately is just a droid.''
''That's not to say he's not a threat. He'll fight you with his lightsabers and gut you with his gun when you're not looking. He's not gonna play fair. He's gonna do whatever he has to do to win and that's what makes Grievous kind of a challenge for the Jedi, who are used to very elegant fighting and fighting on a very fair level.''
Originally posted by Jedi MomThe novel still depicts Grievous' strike-speed as sufficient to very nearly overwhelm Kenobi's Soresu(and by that point, Kenobi had been dubbed THE master of Soresu/defense.) The CG, on the other hand, consistently depicts Grievous giving Kenobi hell in sabers every time they meet.
Filoni disagrees with the novel.
So what exactly does Filoni disagree with?
It's pretty obvious that pre-ROTS!Grievous was intended to be a juggernaut of epic proportions who dismantled Jedi Masters left and right. (In one associated comic, he disposes of Ventress and Durge simultaneously with contemptuous ease.)
Post-ROTS!Grievous is another animal entirely. Depending on favorable conditions, he can contend with respected fighters in a strict duel. But this is not the same animal who could take on Mace Windu as was depicted in LOE. Especially when the Force enters the equation, Grievous is fodder.
Originally posted by Jedi Mom
Damn I didn't know he took on Ventress who schooled him in TCW. What's the comic called?
Originally posted by Col. Valerian
That's exactly why when he first appeared in RotS, I felt so disappointed. After watching him in the animated series of TCW, I couldn't wait to see him on the big screen.
Yeah, I used to have a primo seat on that particular bandwagon. Not so much now. I buy into Filoni's argument that Grievous is, ultimately, a particularly badass droid. He should challenge the Jedi under certain circumstances and favorable conditions, but the Force is simply too great an advantage for mooks to overcome in anything approaching "a fair fight."
Now, what Grievous should be and has never really been shown to be is a tactician par excellence. I want to see him demolish Republic fleets with impunity, for that is his true purpose and worth in the war.
Originally posted by Galan007
This wasn't implied at all.She had a hard time with that Magnaguard, because that Mangaguard's skill-level was roughly equal to hers.
Come on man, you can't say that. That fight never finished. And there was too much going on at that time. She took on multiple magnaguards simultaneously later, after sufficient rest, on a more stationery platform and when that was her sole focus.
If your claiming that single magnaguard was much more formidable, then where's your proof that Grievous >>> than that single(apparently uber skilled) magnaguard?
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
And yes Kenobi handily beat Grievous after so many tries.
Don't lie. He's beaten him in "Grievous Intrigue" and in "Arc Troopers." Basically every time they fight for a prolonged period Grievous runs for his life.
Originally posted by Galan007
The novel would disagree with you.
The movie would disagree with the novel.
Unless the novel is considered higher canon than the movie itself, then there's no point arguing this. From what we see in the movie, Grievous gets his arse handed to him and then runs for his life, failing.
Staying on topic, Shaak Tii wins.
Originally posted by The_Tempesta.) Grievous beat a n00b Asajj, very early in the Clone Wars-- so early, in fact, that Anakin was (obviously) still a Padawan at the time. Given that Anakin was promoted to a Knight roughly 4 weeks after the battle of Geonosis, this means Grievous must have confronted Asajj/Durge less than a month after the events of AotC. In short: back then she was a far cry from the badass she's evolved into throughout the CG.
(In one associated comic, he disposes of Ventress and Durge simultaneously with contemptuous ease.)
b.) He hardly beat Asajj and Durge "easily":
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623200_1.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623202_2.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623204_3.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623208_4.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623211_5.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623215_6.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623216_7.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623219_8.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623223_9.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623226_10.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623228_11.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623231_12.jpg]
[img=http://s4d4.turboimagehost.com/t/15623233_13.jpg]
Lets be honest: Grievous did absolutely nothing in the cartoon that should lead anyone with a smidgen of common sense to believe he was above his CG incarnation. His best feat in the cartoon was besting 3 fodder Jedi+Shaak Ti and Mundi-- ALL of whom were, by Mundi's own accord, "exhausted" at the time. Like I've said before: cartoon grievous may have *seemed* more powerful/skillful, but that is primarily because nearly every Jedi he faced was either no-name fodder, or fatigued at the time. In the CG he's consistently held his own against multiple Jedi of note.
Originally posted by DARTH POWERThere was nothing else going on. Shaak Ti and the Hammerhead no-name Jedi were fighting Magnaguards atop the carrier. That's it. At NO point in time did Shaak Ti gain an advantage over said Magnaguard-- and she had ample time in which to do so.
Come on man, you can't say that. That fight never finished. And there was too much going on at that time.
Originally posted by DARTH POWERSame clip. Grievous consistently forces back Shaak Ti + 2 other fodder Jedi.
where's your proof that Grievous >>> than that single(apparently uber skilled) magnaguard?
Originally posted by Col. ValerianThe novel coincides quite well with what we saw in the film, actually. Kenobi tries going strike-for-strike with Grievous initially, and swiftly realizes that his speed is too overwhelming to defend against-- so he goes on the offensive and begins lopping off GG's hands one-by-one, before force-pushing him away.
The movie would disagree with the novel.Unless the novel is considered higher canon than the movie itself, then there's no point arguing this. From what we see in the movie, Grievous gets his arse handed to him and then runs for his life, failing.
The novel just put some much-needed narrative behind what we see happen on screen.