Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Started by CPT Space Bomb260 pages

Originally posted by NemeBro
I'VE BEEN CAUGHT
You are literally a worthless presence on these boards. Savior of Kmc? 😂 You haven't even watched a single movie this year...yet you try to debate in movie boards....

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
You are literally a worthless presence on these boards. Savior of Kmc? 😂 You haven't even watched a single movie this year...yet you try to debate in movie boards....
Still mad I see.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
You are literally a worthless presence on these boards. Savior of Kmc? 😂 You haven't even watched a single movie this year...yet you try to debate in movie boards....
😂

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Meta what on the fandom?

Rehashing ANH was playing it safe. Nothing more, nothing less. But I'd personally just rewatch ANH. Still this film was worth watching to me just for the Escape from Jakku on the Millenium Falcon.

ANH never introduced us to the idea of a Clone Army. That was AOTC. ANH only named the war for us.

Comment. Its when you say something about something. Like how making a movie where the villains are a bunch of insane legacy-obsessed, backwards-looking fanboys worried that nothing will ever be as good as the original or as cool as Darth Vader might be saying something about that franchises fandom.

Your constant girly whinging is noted, though unneeded.

Its called the Clone Wars. Its not hard to put it together that it probably had clones fighting wars in it. And amazingly it ****ing did. Wow, if Lucas hadn't of showed us that we'd sure never have cottoned on to that.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Comment. Its when you say something about something. Like how making a movie where the villains are a bunch of insane legacy-obsessed, backwards-looking fanboys worried that nothing will ever be as good as the original or as cool as Darth Vader might be saying something about that franchises fandom.

Your constant girly whinging is noted, though unneeded.

Its called the Clone Wars. Its not hard to put it together that it probably had clones fighting wars in it. And amazingly it ****ing did. Wow, if Lucas hadn't of showed us that we'd sure never have cottoned on to that.

Owned.

😂

Originally posted by Nephthys

Your constant girly whinging is noted, though unneeded.
Oddly sexist for a feminist. 👇

Originally posted by Nephthys
Comment. Its when you say something about something. Like how making a movie where the villains are a bunch of insane legacy-obsessed, backwards-looking fanboys worried that nothing will ever be as good as the original or as cool as Darth Vader might be saying something about that franchises fandom.

Your constant girly whinging is noted, though unneeded.

Its called the Clone Wars. Its not hard to put it together that it probably had clones fighting wars in it. And amazingly it ****ing did. Wow, if Lucas hadn't of showed us that we'd sure never have cottoned on to that.

That might be the case if the heroes weren't also backwards looking and whose journey's are framed as being forced to live up to our former heroes legends(which shouldn't be hard---our old heroes were failures). Whether one likes Rey or not, and I don't, she has less of a choice in the proceedings than Kylo Ben. She must live up to Luke Skywalker's legacy and the film doesn't think that is a bad thing.

The film itself is also horribly backwards looking and trying to live up to legacy so whatever snide commentary they have is lost. Calling Kylo Ben pathetic for trying to emulate Vader loses some bite when the whole film is trying to emulate the creation of some punk movie brat in the 70's. Same droid with a thing missing, same super weapon(though Freud would have a few things to say about it), same locales meant to hearken back to the good old days, same heroes fighting the good fight(Leia), same scoundrels in debt, same Jedi with a different name(Luke instead of Yoda), same old school writer, same composer, and ultimately the galaxy remains the same 30 years later with a resistance and a First Order instead of a rebellion and an empire.

So if Kylo Ben being a loser is supposed to be a comment about fanboys who never leave their comfort zone, then it is a pretty weak comment. This film is all about being in the very same comfort zone and bending in every way to make it just right for their fans to feel comfy.

Also don't be sexist.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Oddly sexist for a feminist. 👇

Weren't you just calling people idiots in another thread and posted a picture of a crying baby to mock someone?

Originally posted by Trocity
Weren't you just calling people idiots in another thread and posted a picture of a crying baby to mock someone?
He is a troll tbh.

Originally posted by Trocity
Weren't you just calling people idiots in another thread and posted a picture of a crying baby to mock someone?
How is that relevant to Nephthys' sexism?

Originally posted by Trocity
Weren't you just calling people idiots in another thread and posted a picture of a crying baby to mock someone?

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is a troll tbh.
Sadly it's true.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Comment. Its when you say something about something. Like how making a movie where the villains are a bunch of insane legacy-obsessed, backwards-looking fanboys worried that nothing will ever be as good as the original or as cool as Darth Vader might be saying something about that franchises fandom.

Your constant girly whinging is noted, though unneeded.

Its called the Clone Wars. Its not hard to put it together that it probably had clones fighting wars in it. And amazingly it ****ing did. Wow, if Lucas hadn't of showed us that we'd sure never have cottoned on to that.

Nah Abrams was just being Unoriginal. But I give you credit for trying to find a deeper meaning to his Unoriginality.

After your whinging of the Prequels for the past decade I find your inability to take a bit of criticism on this completely Unoriginal film pretty hilarious.

Yeah keep pretending you knew what the Clone Wars was all about since you saw ANH. There was all sorts of crazy theories just a couple of years before AOTC. The main one being that Sidious makes evil Jedi clones to fight the Jedi. A Clone Trooper Army was certainly not top of the list.

The reference in this movie would make no sense unless you've seen AOTC/ROTS. They referenced the PT in this movie, and not for the first/only time. Quit whinging about it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am not saying it as groundbreaking at the time I'm saying to me it's far more enjoyable as ANH was always lame to me compared to the other Star Wars films.

Difficult to argue against your opinion, you're allowed to enjoy what you enjoy, even if it's made of inferior film making.

You frigging Mad Max hater ahah

Originally posted by Nephthys
Seriously, your measurement of if the movie was good or not is if it added some starship designs and a rule for the villains? I've seen some stupid criticisms but that takes the cake.

Just because it was poorly written doesn't mean that it's a bad movie. Secondly, I never considered new designs to be concepts integral to the setting. The only time I brought up designs was when Teg said that he thought all designs were similar or looked like prototypes in the prequels. But redesigns in terms of droids, lightsabers, vehicles etc. aren't new concepts.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Kylo Ren's new lightsaber design, tentacle-rape monster, Phasma's chrome armor, BB-8, C3PO has a red arm.

None of these are new concepts.

Originally posted by Nephthys
new force powers,

Which is the same mistake the prequels did, the Force was not about specific powers until the prequels came around and decided that the lightning the Emperor sapped Luke with wasn't so much one in a thousand ways for the Emperor to torture Luke, but rather a specific ability that that's unlocked when you reach Sith Lord level 11.

That said, Darth Vader did stop a Blaster bolt in The Empire Strikes back; and the mind-reading contradicts A New Hope.

Originally posted by Nephthys
a new dark side order that isn't Sith,

As far as we know the Knights of Ren are Sith with a new label slapped onto it. No difference between the two has been established.

Originally posted by Nephthys
force sensitives who aren't Jedi or Sith,

You mean like every Podracer?

Originally posted by Nephthys
Traitor-man's sword and shield thing,

Granted.

Originally posted by Nephthys
stormtroopers getting taken as children and trained/indoctrinated like Jedi,

Then how is it a new concept?

Originally posted by Nephthys
doing stuff at lightspeed,

What?

Originally posted by Nephthys
Kylo Ren struggling with the lightside,

You mean like Anakin and Luke with the Dark Side but reversed? Yeah, that's a bit of a stretch.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Reys life as a scavenger

Granted.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Of course, you're missing the whole point that the movie is about nostalgia and clinging on to the past. Kylo Ren worships a mangled mask and dreams of equaling a long dead man while purposefully trying to emulate him as much as possible. Rey makes her living scrounging off shattered relics of past conflicts and is voluntarily caged on Jakku by her past, stuck in a cycle shes unwilling to move out of. Han can't move beyond past mistakes and turns back to a profession he long left behind. Leia goes back to her days as a rebellion leader and uses the same shitty tactics of x-wing dogfights and miracle wins while searching for her brother instead of finding something or someone new. Hux and the First Order are all too young to actually have known the Empire and are left simply emulating it to the hilt and making the same mistakes. C3PO has a new arm, but he gets rid of it for his old one because it was red. Which is dumb.

Calling the movie unoriginal is almost a fair criticism, but considering it's one of the main themes of the movie it's kind of stupid to complain about to this degree. It's completely intentional and it's actually pretty ****ing clever. Especially as a meta-comment on the fandom.


Bullshit. And I can prove it with two names without even criticizing your cherry-pciking: Finn and Poe. Two of the three main characters are not clinging to the past or invoke any sense of nostalgia.

And I don't know how many times I've heard the excuse "the movie was good because it was intentionally bad." This is just something some idiot decided to read into the movie because of how lackluster it was.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Also the clone concept was added in ANH when they mention the clone wars. I can get how you'd forget that, its only the first 20 minutes of the entire franchise.

Yes the Clone Wars was mentioned, but the clone concept wasn't established.

How can you say there's no new concepts in SW? The only important new concepts we need in a movie is new characters. And we got that and a couple of good ones.

Clones and Clone War is only background.

i still don't understand why ep7 is singled out as being unoriginal, as if the whole saga has been consecutive revolutions in story telling ...until NOW.

Originally posted by queeq
How can you say there's no new concepts in SW?

There are a few, but nothing worth mentioning. The only "big thing" that I can think of is that the Force has become a Deus Ex Machina, and that's a determent.

Originally posted by queeq
The only important new concepts we need in a movie is new characters. And we got that and a couple of good ones.

Let's get one thing straight. It's not the writing that makes the characters good, it's the actors; and with a multi-billion dollar franchise like Star Wars you should expect good acting.

You should also expect good writing. But the writing of The Force Awakens would be considered bad by amateur standards. I've seen movies with the budget of $12 better written than this. Don't believe me?

YouTube video

Originally posted by queeq
Clones and Clone War is only background.

It's the background that will keep the franchise alive after the new trilogy is done. The video games, comic books, novels and TV series, etc. will primarily work with what the movies will leave behind; and so far we've got nothing.

Originally posted by queeq
How can you say there's no new concepts in SW? The only important new concepts we need in a movie is new characters. And we got that and a couple of good ones.

Clones and Clone War is only background.

If one does not like the new characters, what does this movie have to offer you? I mean I adore Liam Neeson as Qui-Gon but save the movie he doesn't.

Originally posted by Astner

Let's get one thing straight. It's not the writing that makes the characters good, it's the actors;

no, it's both.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
no, it's both.
Correct.