Originally posted by DarknessX7
You need to actually follow the conversation to understand what bearing it has on Malak. You were the one who questioned Maul's skill against Sidious, so I'm not sure what you expected.
Nope. The point is, Maul being able to defend briefly against Sidious holding back has no pertaining to this conversation. It doesn't show Malak, who has not and never will, hopefully, met either is weak. Malak is stated to be a fine duelist in a time before both sides stopped learning a lot of their techniques. So if you're not sure what I expected, I expected something relevant.
Because no one was suicidal enough to journey out into unknown territory against an entire fleet of Sith without any knowledge as the where the Star Forge resided. Even Revan wasn't so blind as to go gallivanting into unknown regions without reacquiring the Star Forge's position. Additionally, Malak was fueled with power from the Star Forge throughout his entire reign as Dark Lord of the Sith. How would Atris even get close enough to him, and how could she stand against such dark side energy? Context. It's all about the context.
The Jedi Civil War was in Republic space. The entire time, Atris is hiding out, on a mountain doing nothing. It's not like Malak was always on the Star Forge. Certainly not when he was bombarding Taris or Telos, a planet Atris conveniently went to after a great threat almost glassed her. Malak is not drawing on the Star Forge when he's not at the Star Forge, and it didn't follow him around, the star it was powered on, in tow.
I responded directly to what you wrote. You even said:I am limited to my responses by your statements, which I thought were perfectly acceptable to discuss. If you don't think what Malak said had bearing on Malak's strength, then you shouldn't have inferred that his quote meant Malak was admitting he couldn't defeat Revan. Because that has everything to do with his strength. I think it does too, which is why I brought in the initial quote.
Malak isn't fighting Revan here. Neither does Malak being beaten by Revan prove that he is weak. Even then, that doesn't show that he average master is his equal. None of it gives conclusive evidence to anything except that Revan can beat Malak, which was never questionable. That was apparent from the beginning of the game.
Finally, if you don't like opinions, you probably shouldn't be discussing fictional characters on a forum littered with fans.
Calm down.
I like opinions. I don't always agree with them, but they are a part of every discussion. Your opinion is that my opinions have no backing. And that's fine. I can't convince you otherwise, and I'm okay with that. But I'll still discuss the story, the characters, and anything else pertaining to the topics at hand.
Most of the time, from what I've seen, forum duels and competitions are about comparing feats and showing which is greater and basing a character of that. Your opinions mean nothing. Just like everyone elses. Maul killing Jinn is a feat. Maul pressing Obi-wan(TCW) is a feat. Maul being destroyed by Sidious proves nothing except for that Maul got beat by Sidious. Especially when said fight ended in seconds. Your stating that Kyle Katarn can solo a bunch of Jedi Masters because reasons, means absolutely nothing here.