Re: Re: Re: Re: Assessing Soa
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Yoda TK's droid transport ships and Luke moves black holes.
Luke Skywalker never influenced a cosmic black hole. It was an artificial Vong manifestation. And it is not a feat without equal.
Soa lifted and tossed 30 foot statues around as if they were nothing. Want to discuss weight of statues that large? Realistically, they should put Muntuur stones to shame.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
AT-AT can never be that heavy. It is a machine, not a solid mass like a stone.
🤣
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Yoda did not lift them, he moved them into each other.
The force needed to do that is still far superior to tossing around stone statues, lol.
Those are like several hundred meter long vessels that have engines of their own, and Yoda easily accelerates a dozen meters/s^2 at the least, which makes it more impressive than the minimum needed to lift one. And they're easily significantly more than hundreds of thousands of times heavier than those stone statues.
Luke Skywalker never influenced a cosmic black hole. It was an artificial Vong manifestation. And it is not a feat without equal.
They were massive enough to pull in missiles and turbolasers. A singularity the size of those 30 foot tall statues wouldn't even be noticed by anyone, lol.
Soa lifted and tossed 30 foot statues around as if they were nothing. Want to discuss weight of statues that large? Realistically, they should put Muntuur stones to shame.
30 foot tall statues? 😆
Kyp Durron has ragdolled freighters, Luke has destroyed and rebuilt Vader's fortress, Yoda has lifted hundreds of droidekas at the same time, - do you seriously think tossing around 30 foot statues is particularly impressive?
Soa's apparently godlike Force barrier was broken by a drill falling on him. Galen Marek, in comparison, shielded an entire cruiser from atmospheric reentry. Luke has cloaked 1800 meter long capital ships with the Force, Sidious has wrecked super star destroyers - in what universe did you think this makes Soa impressive?
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Why do you ****ers keep treating Ops mechanics as actual showings?
Originally posted by Trocity
LOL
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Originally posted by The Ellimist
🤣
Look at the size of AT-AT:
You guys seriously think it would weigh thousands of tonnes? 🙄
You guys really suck at estimating the size of objects.
---
This behemoth, if built, would have weighed 1000 tons:
Landkreuzer P-1000 Ratte is a relatively much larger vehicle than AT-AT Walker.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD👆AT-ATLandkreuzer can never be that heavy. It is a machine, not a solid mass like a stone.
Anyway, an 11x35m tank is not "much larger" than a 30x20m (going off the movies) AT-AT. 😂
Which only lends credence to the latter being thousands of tonnes. 🤣
Originally posted by Beniboybling
👆Anyway, an 11x35m tank is not "much larger" than a 30x20m (going off the movies) AT-AT. 😂
Which only lends credence to the latter being thousands of tonnes. 🤣
http://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=293
It is not just about height and length. AT-AT is an entirely different design than the behemoth that I used as a reference.
P.1000 dimensions:
Length: 35m
Width: 14m
Height: 11m
AT-AT dimensions:
Length: 20m
Width: 4m
Height: 22.5m
Have a good look:
P.1000 is a far more heavily built vehicle design in comparison.
Originally posted by Trocity
😂Legend don't use his thinker dat much.
Sorry, you don't use your brain much.