Originally posted by Beniboybling
Cool, let's go with 50 then shall we? Noting of course that Soa only breaks off and levitates less than half of each:So we're dealing with what, 20 tonnes each? That's 80 tonnes altogether. Heavier than the Muntuur stones? Sure. Heavier than an AT-AT? Don't be absurd. Even if we assumed that AT-AT was dwarfed by the 1000 tonne tank you provided, said tank would have to be over 12 times its mass for such an assessment to work. Which is again absurd.
Indeed even if we were to assume an AT-AT was half its mass (despite being larger 😂 ), Vader would still be lifting 6 times the mass Soa did.
So Vader is lifting the heavier object here, a much heavier object; Yoda >> Vader, ergo, this feat does not put Soa in Yoda's league, like remotely. Case closed.
EDIT: Corrected the maths, don't worry, Yoda's still better. 🙂
I did not argue that Soa lifted mass equivalent to an AT-AT. However, we shall keep in mind that Soa was not struggling with handling 80 tonnes of mass either. He casually lifted such mass and tossed it around as if it was nothing. And he did this while floating mid-air.
Therefore, Soa could certainly do a lot better then what we see on-screen. He is promoted as a threat to the entire galaxy, my friend.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
These columns are 75 feet tall:Now;
😂
And like I've already pointed out to you, why are you trying to make pictorial analogies and rough guesses when you could just put the AT-AT picture in photoshop and measure its and Luke's relative pixel lengths?
JkBart already did that for you, and you conveniently ignored his post. You instead look for tilted pictures of other things, assume that they're equivalent, and then guess from there.
You're either a dishonest troll or an idiot.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
And like I've already pointed out to you, why are you trying to make pictorial analogies and rough guesses when you could just put the AT-AT picture in photoshop and measure its and Luke's relative pixel lengths?JkBart already did that for you, and you conveniently ignored his post. You instead look for tilted pictures of other things, assume that they're equivalent, and then guess from there.
You're either a dishonest troll or an idiot.
I accept your concession. Your blabbering makes no difference.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Translation: I (The Ellimist) don't want to concede due to my ego.I accept your concession. Your blabbering makes no difference.
"
That tiny Luke over there has 19px height.
AT-AT has 433px height.
433/19 = 22,8
Luke Skywalker = 172 cm height
AT-AT = 172 cm * 22,8 = 3921,6 cm height
3921,6 cm = 39,216 meters
Solved"
Huh. It's almost like you've deliberately avoided responded to Bart's calculations to instead post other unrelated photos and vaguely guess based on your gut feeling.
Jesus, I can't believe you're a functioning human being at this point. Maybe I shouldn't.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
"That tiny Luke over there has 19px height.
AT-AT has 433px height.433/19 = 22,8
Luke Skywalker = 172 cm height
AT-AT = 172 cm * 22,8 = 3921,6 cm height3921,6 cm = 39,216 meters
Solved"
Huh. It's almost like you've deliberately avoided responded to Bart's calculations to instead post other unrelated photos and vaguely guess based on your gut feeling.
Jesus, I can't believe you're a functioning human being at this point. Maybe I shouldn't.
AT-AT has 418 px height
----
1. You misquote my statements
2. I do have a functioning brain, thankfully. I am capable of doing my homework and am good in arts and similar stuff.
3. You better do your own homework before pointing a finger at another person's intellect. You are not as smart as you pretend to be.