Canon Luke vs Canon Palpatine

Started by LordOfTheLight7 pages

I'm saying Luke getting caught off guard by a Padawan

Let's get one thing straight here. It doesn't matter if it was a padawan or The Father who did that. The same "Darth F...ing Sidious" got tagged by someone much inferior to him, because he wasn't prepared for the attack. Similarly, Luke's mind was so scrambled, his passive senses didn't warn him.

That is not an anti feat for Luke at all.

What's more, what's with all the "padawan Kylo Ren" crap? Kylo was older than Luke was in ROTJ or Anakin in ROTS, and he received almost complete training from Luke. In complete contrast to Luke in ROTJ having formal training of a lot lesser quality than that of a youngling.

Yet, the same "padawan, youngling, poorly trained" Luke beat Vader, the Dark Lord of the Sith, in ROTJ. The cheap-shotting there from a beat down, weakened Vader, inferior to Luke( yeah, Luke beat Vader legitimately, "in canon"😉, doesn't bode well for Sidious. If we go by this logic.

My stance hasn't changed in the slightest, in that this is one of the most illogical arguments one can possibly make. Show any amount of incredulity, the fact remains that a person with a massively conflicted mind can be caught off guard by anyone, be it even a youngling. Kylo, having training equal to that of ROTS Anakin( at the very least), and infinitely superior to that of ROTJ Luke, and being older than both, "and" very clearly having the Skywalker potential, this certainly doesn't bear a mark against Luke. And no, I am not dictating that Kylo is now suddenly comparable to either. Yet he clearly is far superior than any normal padawan( possibly knight) as well.

Originally posted by LordOfTheLight
[b] I'm saying Luke getting caught off guard by a Padawan

Let's get one thing straight here. It doesn't matter if it was a padawan or The Father who did that. The same "Darth F...ing Sidious" got tagged by someone much inferior to him, because he wasn't prepared for the attack. Similarly, Luke's mind was so scrambled, his passive senses didn't warn him.

This is also a dumb false equivalency. Vader is rated at 80% of Sidious power wise as per canon and in addition, was fully focused and distracted. It'd be a credible point if Sidious were starting at him.

What's more, what's with all the "padawan Kylo Ren" crap? Kylo was older than Luke was in ROTJ or Anakin in ROTS, and he received almost complete training from Luke. In complete contrast to Luke in ROTJ having formal training of a lot lesser quality than that of a youngling.

We have no idea how long Kylo had been trained for. But we haven't seen anything to suggest he was anything but a Padawan.


Yet, the same "padawan, youngling, poorly trained" Luke beat Vader, the Dark Lord of the Sith, in ROTJ. The cheap-shotting there from a beat down, weakened Vader, inferior to Luke( yeah, Luke beat Vader legitimately, "in canon"😉, doesn't bode well for Sidious. If we go by this logic.

Yoda flat out said his training was complete aside from confronting Vader. Luke's just a prodigy.


My stance hasn't changed in the slightest, in that this is one of the most illogical arguments one can possibly make. Show any amount of incredulity, the fact remains that a person with a massively conflicted mind can be caught off guard by anyone, be it even a youngling. Kylo, having training equal to that of ROTS Anakin( at the very least), and infinitely superior to that of ROTJ Luke, and being older than both, "and" very clearly having the Skywalker potential, this certainly doesn't bear a mark against Luke. And no, I am not dictating that Kylo is now suddenly comparable to either. Yet he clearly is far superior than any normal padawan( possibly knight) as well.

Training doesn't particularly matter. AOTCs Anakin has more training than ROTJ Luke, but Luke is more powerful. Kylo's feats don't really show him as being anywhere near that level currently, let alone years earlier.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
This is also a dumb false equivalency. Vader is rated at 80% of Sidious power wise as per canon and in addition, was fully focused and distracted. It'd be a credible point if Sidious were starting at him.

We have no idea how long Kylo had been trained for. But we haven't seen anything to suggest he was anything but a Padawan.

Yoda flat out said his training was complete aside from confronting Vader. Luke's just a prodigy.

Training doesn't particularly matter. AOTCs Anakin has more training than ROTJ Luke, but Luke is more powerful. Kylo's feats don't really show him as being anywhere near that level currently, let alone years earlier.

1. It is pretty evident that someone who has been battered by someone else who Palpatine effectively destroyed, will "not" be 80% of Palpatine.

Regardless, it doesn't matter "who" caught Luke off guard. Non-force sensitives have caught Jedi Masters off guard before.

"Non-force sensitives". Who are literally nothing, absolutely nothing to them. Likewise, opponents of a similar calibre too, have caught Jedi off guard.

It....does....not....matter.

Since we are taking Lucas''s words at face value here, he has implied that Vader before the suit was as powerful as Sidious and Yoda( indeed the tiering system that he and Gillard developed outright says that). Yet simply due to his immense rage and anger, he was completely unable to sense his own Master, standing just feet away from him till he saw him. Vader, upto that singular point( till he sees Obi Wan), is the most powerful he has ever been. The thing which you need to get into your skull, is that during moments of extreme emotion, you are not expected to sense things which you are supposed to sense passively when you are otherwise balanced. It doesn't matter how powerful you are. This is purely dependent on your state of mind.

Getting caught off guard has nothing to do with your opponent and everything to do with you.

2. So is Kylo, and clearly a "Skywalker level" prodigy. Also, Yoda said no more training do you require, because Luke had learned the essentials, that is, initiate level stuff on his own. However, the quality of his self training would, pretty obviously be much worse than the quality of training he would get from a master.

3. Kylo was pretty much equal to Rey in their force struggle, and Rey's Tk feat blows most PT era Council Members out of the water. What's more, Rey struggled to match Kylo, much more than she struggled with the rocks( she actually didn't), so such a feat would be pretty casual for current Kylo.

Not sure exactly how powerful previous Kylo would be, but by then he had already fallen to the dark side and under Snoke's influence.

Lastly, another reason your argument falls apart, is that there isn't a shred of logic to it. You know, very well, that Kylo is a prodigy and it has been made very clear that he has the Skywalker potential. You know, again, that Kylo was trained, at the very least, in a much better fashion than Luke was( unless you are suggesting that his training was somehoe worse than Luke spending those few weeks on Dagobah, which needless to say, is retarded). In addition, he's older than Luke was.

So, assuming that Luke is so powerful, he is able to go toe to toe with Vader who grounds 99.999% of Jedi Masters in all of SW to dust, is it really far fetched to say that Ben/Kylo at the time would be extremely powerful in his own right? Really not, is the answer. So, even if we go by the silly assumption that somehow, being cheap-shotted by a weak person is an anti-feat, by all grounds, Kylo isn't/wasn't a weak person.

Heck, Kenobi was a padawan in TPM, and he was recognized as one of the most capable and best Jedi of his day, among the echelons of the best masters of the Jedi Order. All Kylo lacks is exposure. Have you even stopped to consider that it might as well be a feat for Kylo instead of the anti feat for Luke that you are continuing to parrot?

So, really, your argument holds no merit. There is literally nothing to it from any perspective we take. Right from your pretty baseless suggestion that padawan Kylo is fodder, to your literal refusal to acknowledge that Luke was massively conflicted( which you have ignored for the most part), and could possibly not have been expected to sense a cheap-shot coming his way, not when literally so many characters, powerful ones have been cheap-shotted before,

And lastly, your utterly illogical equation of you getting caught off guard, to your opponent, and not your frame of mind.

At any rate, I think we should discontinue this tirade. I personally find it incredibly illogical, and you are completely convinced of it. There is little chance of us finding common ground here.

I'll write my thoughts on this in time, but I just wanna quickly add that we have to consider HOW BAD Revenge of the Sith was shot and cut. Just look at the Sheev vs Windu team scene. Sheev looks so telegraphed, whereas we know he was that fast Winu literally couldn't react. It was just poorly shot. Plus Lucas insisted that the actual actors did most/all the fighting sequences [the Sidious vs Windu scenes].

Luke really has nothing to suggest he'd defeat Palpatine 1 on 1 in a straight up fight.

The Emperor wins.

Impossible to know. Probably would be a good fight

Luke’s implied to be Uber powerful, just by Kylo’s reaction to him appearing. Getting every one of his Forces to fire on him.

Or he just wanted to see him completely obliterated. Also I feel like were gonna be losing the Falcon next movie with the way things are going for it..

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Or he just wanted to see him completely obliterated.

Nah he was clearly panicked. And when Hux says “I think we got him” Kylo still wasn’t convinced.

/Shrug

Didn't seem that way to me, but might have to rewatch. Kinda wondering how they are gonna deal with Leia though since Carrie is gone yet her character is still alive..

Luke’s implied to be Uber powerful, just by Kylo’s reaction to him appearing. Getting every one of his Forces to fire on him.

👆 👆

he also ordered all of the tie fighters to go after the falcon. i wouldn't assume kylo's actions can be assumed to be backed by reason

Originally posted by Lord Stark
We see Dooku does the same thing to Yoda in AOTCs (he attempts to one-shot him with lighting) And he is able to react to it and block it.

And yeah if I see someone raising a gun to my face that doesn't mean I can react to it.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
he also ordered all of the tie fighters to go after the falcon. i wouldn't assume kylo's actions can be assumed to be backed by reason

They were, because the fighters failed. The falcon has a reputation as well, as does it's pilot, Chewbacca.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
It was lightning from Darth Sidious. Nothing pathetic about getting tagged by that.
One of the most biased responses not being subtle about your bias for Palpatine. Fact is he announces his intentions and it takes two seconds to execute yet he still hits Yoda with the attack. Pitiful.

Originally posted by The Lost
Stark is so delusional he truly doesn't see his points eviscerated or his own bias in the mirror. He's a fanboy.

Palpatine stomps. More feats.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Stark is so delusional he truly doesn't see his points eviscerated or his own bias in the mirror. He's a fanboy.

I'm glad I could help you get that off your chest. I'm sure you've felt that way about yourself for some time.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
I'm glad I could help you get that off your chest. I'm sure you've felt that way about yourself for some time.
If you were being honest you'd admit to it and just say you're biased.