Originally posted by Lord Stark
Yeah, you all keep formulating this strawman that I'm trying to say Luke is inferior to a padawan. That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying Luke getting caught off guard by a Padawan
Luke in a state of emotional turmoil (both explicitly stated and showed on screen) != Luke in a fair fight. This concept - a high potential / relatively low actualized power combatant getting in a shot against a superior, distracted foe happens like in almost every single piece of Star Wars canon or legends.
in conjunction with his lack of real showings
That suggests uncertainty, not weakness. I know you could say "well in the absence of more information the probability that he's such an outlier as to be Sidious-tier is unlikely", but that doesn't work here because the default assumption for Luke Skywalker would be that he's on Sidious's tier because of his canon potential.
But if you think that's a lame copout, then fine - but it's even lamer to say "he didn't do much so therefore he's weak", because the uncertainty card favors the prior assumption that he grew much more powerful from being = Vader in RotJ, not that he's weak.
is disqualifying for him to be even remotely comparable to Sidious. If Old Master Maul's only real combat feats in Rebels were getting wrecked by Kanan and then dying of exhaustion after projecting himself in a duel on Tatooine with Kenobi no one would be attempting to argue he's even remotely comparable to Darth Sidious. Because it's ridiculous. That's literally all I've been arguing this whole time. [/B]
You're also ignoring that he has the most impressive Force feat in the entire movie saga. Well, you're not ignoring it - but you're unnecessarily downplaying it.