Originally posted by SmurphI looked at my post again. It's poorly structured. I blame Obama.
"hardly outmatched" isn't the same as "likely to win" though. There's a disconnect between your third para and your conclusion.And, actually, your second para suddenly shifts from comparing Nefaria to Thor/Hulk, to comparing Hercules to Thor/Hulk. If fighting Nefaria would be like fighting Hulk, then it's a given that Nefaria wouldn't overwhelm Hulk, but irrelevant to the argument as structured.
EDIT: never mind, I just can't read, your analogy holds. I guess I just disagree.
EDIT EDIT: oh, the disconnect is between the paras. If Herc fighting Nefaria is like Thor fighting Nefaria, then Herc fighting Thor is not an analogy for how this fight plays out. Herc and Thor sit on the same side of the analogy. /shrug
I guess I consider Count Nefaria, Thor, Hercules and Savage Hulk as being peers with Hercules having the clear upperhand with skill that can close the gap w/ other esoteric powers or strength differences. So everyone can sit on either side of the analogy.
But that's basically assuming my conclusion. And I hate when people do that. Once again, I blame Obama.